Author:
Daito Nobuhiko,Gifford Jonathan L.
Abstract
Purpose
– The use of public-private partnerships (P3s) for infrastructure delivery, particularly for highway projects, has been increasing in the USA. The purpose of this paper is to empirically evaluate the difference of P3s and non-P3 highway projects, in terms of their costs and efficiency.
Design/methodology/approach
– An empirical model of highway construction costs was estimated using a linear regression model that explicitly accounts for the cost differential between the contracts. The differences between efficiencies was also evaluated through a two-stage analysis, where projects’-specific technical efficiencies were first estimated using stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis, and then the difference in technical efficiencies between the two groups were evaluated through non-parametric tests of means.
Findings
– Controlling for various project characteristics, the P3 highway projects in the USA showed higher initial costs than non-P3 projects. However, the efficiency scores showed no significant difference between the two groups. This inconsistency between initial costs and technical efficiency scores suggests the complexity involved in P3 projects, which are not captured in the efficiency analysis.
Research limitations/implications
– Limited availability of P3 project data due to their immaturity (in cases of P3 projects that include operation and management) and their complex engineering specifications may have caused biased results. Importantly, the study analyzed project costs as of financial close; post-financial close variations, such as change orders during construction, cost/schedule overruns, and renegotiation of contract terms, are beyond the scope of the analysis in this study.
Originality/value
– The present study contributes to the literature as one of the earliest empirical analyses of the performance of highway P3s in the USA. Also, this is one of the first studies to employ frontier analysis methods that focus on the efficiency of highway project delivery.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance
Reference47 articles.
1. Acar, M.
,
Guo, C.
and
Yang, K.
(2008), “Accountability when hierarchical authority is absent: views from public-private partnership practitioners”,
American Review of Public Administration
, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 3-23.
2. Banker, R.D.
,
Charnes, A.
and
Cooper, W.W.
(1984), “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis”,
Management Science
, Vol. 30 No. 9, pp. 1078-1092.
3. Blanc-Brude, F.
,
Goldsmith, H.
and
Valila, T.
(2009), “A comparison of construction contract prices for traditionally procured roads and public-private partnerships”,
Review of Industrial Organization
, Vol. 35 Nos 1/2, pp. 12-40.
4. Boardman, A.E.
and
Vining, A.R.
(2010), “P3s in North America: renting the money (in Canada), selling the roads (in the USA)”,
International Handbook on Public-Private Partnerships
, in
Hodge, G.A.
,
Greve, C.
and
Boardman, A.E.
(Eds), Edward Elgar Publishing Inc., Northampton, MA, pp. 499-509.
5. Burr, J.
,
Mackay, R.
and
Mills, M.
(2011), “P3 business case development guide”, available at: www.p3canada.ca/_files/file/P3_Business_Case_Development_Guide.pdf (accessed July 30, 2012).
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献