Abstract
PurposeLabor market studies show that job applicants are naturally inclined to embellish or omit information on their resumes, to gain advantage over other applicants. Religiosity can reveal much about an individual's sense of right and wrong and it has importance as a social force with a foundational role in ethical development. The study’s objective is to clarify the relationship between personal religiosity and the intentional deceitful presentation of information on resumes, as well as the judgment of situations with ethical content.Design/methodology/approachThe study is comprised of Jewish adult participants that submitted a resume in search of a job in the past 30 weeks in Israel. The questionnaire included questions regarding resume fraud, tolerance towards unethical and illegal behaviors and demographic and occupational questions.FindingsThe authors' results indicate that religious status may be a predictor of resume deception. Religious applicants reported more rigorous moral ethics, manifested by less tolerant attitudes toward unethical and illegal behaviors in comparison to seculars, which in turn, were associated with decreased tendency to deceive on resumes.Practical implicationsFor many countries, and especially emerging markets, the Covid pandemic negatively affected the economy and creating sufficient employment may be a challenge. A better understanding of the personal factors associated with problematic job searching behaviors is relevant.Originality/valueDespite the recognized importance of religion as a social force with a foundational role in ethical development, there is a lack of research on the impact of religiosity on ethical decisions in the labor market. The authors propose explanations for the results based on the theory of planned behavior and perceptions of normative beliefs.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference46 articles.
1. The theory of planned behavior;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process,1991
2. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (2005), “The influence of attitudes on behavior”, in Albarracín, D., Johnson, B.T. and Zanna, M.P. (Eds), The Handbook of Attitudes, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 173-221.
3. Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: the case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation;Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2004
4. Resume fraud: lies, omissions and exaggerations;The Personnel Journal,1995
5. Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer's wrongdoing;Journal of Business Ethics,1996
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献