Author:
Schoenherr Tobias,Hilpert Ditmar,Soni Ashok K.,Venkataramanan M.A.,Mabert Vincent A.
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a better understanding about drivers of enterprise systems complexity (ESC), as well as its multi‐faceted conceptualization.Design/methodology/approachCase studies were conducted among German Mittelstand companies by an international research team. A grounded theory approach was followed, with the first phase of the case studies being exploratory, and the second phase being more focused.FindingsCase study findings suggest that ESC is a multi‐dimensional construct consisting of the following dimensions: seamlessness, adoption date, number of integrated subsystems, system type/composition, number of functional areas linked, and number of users. Drivers of ESC identified via the case studies include the multi‐dimensional constructs of competition, complexity of processes, complexity of products, global operations, and the firm's customer base. Grounded theory development is used to conceptualize the measures of these drivers. Founded in these exploratory observations propositions for future research are developed.Originality/valueThe research reports on the experiences of companies with enterprise systems (ES), and explores organizational factors determining system complexity; as a sampling frame Mittelstand companies in Southwest Germany are chosen, making this study one of the few exploring ES within this context. The paper also places ESC within theoretical domains, especially the STS theory. The conceptualization of ESC and its antecedents presented provides a starting point for future academic research into this area.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference69 articles.
1. Avgerou, C., Ciborra, C. and Land, F. (2004), The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation Actors and Contexts, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Bendoly, E. and Jacobs, F.R. (2004), “ERP architectural/operational alignment for order‐processing performance”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 99‐117.
3. Bendoly, E. and Schoenherr, T. (2005), “ERP system and implementation‐process benefits: implications for B2B e‐procurement”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 304‐19.
4. Bendoly, E., Soni, A.K. and Venkataramanan, M.A. (2004), “Value chain resource planning: adding value with systems beyond the enterprise”, Business Horizons, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 79‐86.
5. Bendoly, E., Bachrach, D.G., Wang, H. and Zhang, S. (2006), “ERP in the minds of supervisors: joint roles of task interdependence and cultural norms”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 558‐78.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献