Building factory fitness

Author:

Ferdows Kasra,Thurnheer Fritz

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to introduce the notion of fitness in production as something different from leanness and show that building fitness puts a factory on a course of developing cumulative capabilities and improving its ability to respond to changing market and business conditions.Design/methodology/approachThe paper examines the process of design, launch, and management of a fitness program in 42 factories of the Hydro Aluminum Extrusion Group on five continents between 1986 and 2001. The design was based on the “sandcone model” proposed by Ferdows and DeMeyer but the sequence of capabilities was modified to improve safety, reduce process variability, codify and share tacit production know‐how, improve responsiveness, and improve labor and machine efficiency.FindingsMost factories showed improvements higher than industry average in these capabilities during the 15 years. Moreover, they improved the capabilities listed earlier in the above sequence faster than those listed later, indicating that they were becoming more fit.Research limitations/implicationsObservations were in only one company and industry, which limits general applicability of the model. However, measurements were taken over a relatively long period, factories were spread on five continents, and the authors had access to the actual data during the 15 years, which together provided a unique opportunity to gain deep insights from this case. Future research should test the applicability of the model in other industries and companies.Practical implicationsA fitness regimen provides a roadmap for improving core capabilities in a factory. It is different from building leanness. Fitness helps the factory become leaner, but the opposite is not always true. A factory can become too lean but never too fit.Originality/valueThis paper is the first, to the authors' knowledge, to introduce the notion of fitness in production in the literature. Results observed in this case suggest that a better understanding of how factories become fitter provides insights into some of the deeply ingrained practices of superior manufacturers, especially those that stay competitive over long periods.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference44 articles.

1. Bessant, J., Francis, D., Meredith, S., Kaplinsky, R. and Brown, S. (2001), “Developing manufacturing agility in SMEs”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 22 Nos 1‐3, pp. 28‐54.

2. BLS Economic News Release (2008), “US Bureau of Labor Statistics press release”, August 28.

3. BLS News (2003), “US Bureau of Labor Statistics press release”, September 18.

4. Boyer, K.K. and Lewis, M.W. (2002), “Competitive priorities: investigating the need for trade‐offs in operations strategy”, Production and Operations Management, Vol. 11 No. 9, pp. 9‐20.

5. Clark, K. and Margolis, J.D. (2000), “Workplace safety in Alcoa (A)”, Harvard Business School Case No. 692042, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3