Empirical analysis of the relationship between Six Sigma management activities and corporate competitiveness

Author:

Choi Bong,Kim Jongweon,Leem Byung‐hak,Lee Chang‐Yeol,Hong Han‐kuk

Abstract

PurposeThis study proposes a research model to test whether Six Sigma‐based management activities improve corporate competitiveness in Samsung Group.Design/methodology/approachThe paper's model was validated and its hypotheses tested using structural equation model analysis.FindingsEmpirical results showed that Six Sigma activities do indeed contribute to revitalized process management, improved quality, and, finally, lead to corporate competitiveness.Research limitations/implicationsThe survey data were collected at the individual level, such as GB, BB, MBB, and limited to the affiliated companies of Samsung Group. To obtain more meaningful results, data would be collected at the corporate level and the pool of subjects expanded. However, this paper shows that the four fundamental factors (CEO's will, Communication, Training, and Policy) as well as three substantial factors (Information Utilization, Standardization, and Promotion) are meaningful activities influencing the success of Six Sigma management significantly.Originality/valueThe main contribution of this paper lies in the establishment of a causal relationship among Six Sigma activities, process innovation, quality improvement, and company competitiveness, as well as in the proposed managerial implications for Six Sigma projects.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference54 articles.

1. Ahire, L.S. and Golhar, D.Y. (1996), “Quality management in large vs small firms”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 34, April, pp. 1‐13.

2. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1992), “Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models”, Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 21, November, pp. 132‐61.

3. Ashmore, G.M. (1992), “Better information means better quality”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 13, pp. 57‐60.

4. Bender, K.W., Cedeno, J.E., Cirone, J.F., Klaus, K.P., Leahey, L.C. and Menyhert, T.D. (2000), “Process innovation – case studies of critical success factors”, Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 17‐24.

5. Benedetto, A.R. (2003), “Adapting manufacturing‐based Six Sigma methodology to the service environment of a radiology film library”, Journal of Healthcare Management, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 263‐80.

Cited by 42 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3