Expectations and tensions in school leadership regarding the 2014 Danish school reform: emerging perspectives linking school leadership, learning and well-being

Author:

Carlsson MonicaORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the expectations of and possible tensions in school leadership regarding the implementation of the 2014 Danish school reform and, by extension, to address emerging perspectives linking school leadership, learning and well-being.Design/methodology/approachAn analysis of central policy documents in the reform as well as research reports examining the role of leadership in the implementation of the reform offers insights into the new expectations of and tensions in school leadership. Drawing on theories of school leadership, the analysis highlights the various forms and aspects of school leadership that are at play in the reform.FindingsThe analysis identifies expectations regarding school leadership, ranging from aspects of strategic leadership that focus on management by objectives and results to aspects that are closer to teaching, such as curriculum and instructional leadership. It furthermore highlights barriers with regard to realizing policy intentions of strengthening instructional leadership, such as encroaching upon pedagogical and curriculum leadership, which have traditionally been the domain of teachers. Meanwhile, the kind of leadership that can be practiced through data-based management by objectives and results seems to have been perceived as a more viable approach in the implementation of the reform.Research limitations/implicationsThe papers' theoretical and empirical foundation is rooted in Danish and Scandinavian perspectives on schooling, and thus the generalizability of the findings may be limited to countries with similar perspectives or “packages of expectations” on linking school leadership, learning and well-being.Originality/valueThe paper provides an original contribution through its engagement with the tensions inherent in the specific “package of expectations” and new demands on school leadership in the 2014 school reform.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education

Reference35 articles.

1. Biesta, G. and Priestly, M. (2013), “A curriculum for the twenty-first century?”, in Priestly, M. and Biesta, G. (Eds), Reinventing the New Curriculum: New Trends in Curriculum Police and Practice, Bloomsbury Academic, London, pp. 229-236.

2. School leadership under the “Folkeskole”-reform;(Skoleledelse under folkeskolereformen), VIVE- The National Research and Analysis Centre for Welfare,2019

3. Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: examining policy, practice and school positioning;Journal of Education Policy,2010

4. Carlsson, M. (2017), “Wellbeing measurements – as a part of evaluation and quality assurance in the school”, in Schultz, A., von Seelen, J. (Ed), A School in Movement. Learning, Wellbeing and Health, (En skole i bevægelse. Læring, trivsel og sundhed), Akademisk Forlag, pp. 287-301.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3