The absurdity of the modern law of town and village greens

Author:

Spencer Tom

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to use doctrinal legal investigative methods combined with economic analysis to investigate the efficacy of the Law. Design/methodology/approach The purpose of this paper is to explain the inherent absurdity in the modern law of town and village greens (TVGs). The author wishes to show that the public understanding of what constitutes a green worth protecting is incomparable with how the Law currently operates, instead providing a crude vehicle to prevent development. Findings Applying an efficiency maximisation framework to the law of TVGs the Law fails to protect land worth protecting, as well as prevents allocatively efficient bargaining from taking place. Research limitations/implications This research has not presented empirical evidence to suggest the extent of the damage identified. This is a separate question to the marginal impacts of the damage. Originality/value A Law and Economics analysis of TVG Law in England and Wales has not been attempted before.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Urban Studies

Reference30 articles.

1. Commons, village greens and other open spaces, commons, open spaces and footpaths preservation society,1932

2. What did English villagers mean by ‘customary law’,1996

3. Externality: origins and classification;Natural Resource Journal,2019

4. Modern town and village greens – drawing the threads together;Conveyancer and Property Lawyer,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3