Author:
Amos Clinton,Brockhaus Sebastian,Fawcett Amydee M.,Fawcett Stanley E.,Knemeyer A. Michael
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate how service perceptions influence customer views of the authenticity of corporate sustainability claims. The goal of this paper is to help supply chain decision-makers better understand boundary conditions in order to design more enduring and impactful sustainability programs.Design/methodology/approachThe authors employ behavioral experiments, subjecting two theoretically derived hypotheses to verification across five diverse industries and two distinct sustainability vignettes.FindingsCustomer service perceptions emerge as a significant boundary condition to the perceived authenticity of sustainability efforts. Subjects attributed significantly higher authenticity toward sustainability efforts in above average vs below average service quality contexts. Further, respondents attributed deceptive motivations to sustainability efforts at companies with below average service.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors confirm the underlying tenet of social judgment theory, which suggests thata prioriperceptions create a zone of acceptability or rejection. Ultimately, investing in sustainability can lead to counterproductive cynicism.Practical implicationsThe authors infer that customers’ willingness to give companies credit for sustainability initiatives extends beyond service issues to any practice that influencesa prioriperceptions. Supply chain managers must rethink their role in designing both customer service and sustainability systems to achieve positive returns from sustainability investments.Originality/valueThe authors challenge the assumption that customers universally positively view sustainability efforts. If customers holda priorinegative service perceptions, otherwise well-designed sustainability programs may invoke cynical reactions. Thus, sustainability programs may not inoculate firm reputations from adverse incidents. Given they touch both service and sustainability systems, supply chain managers are positioned to holistically influence their design for competitive advantage.
Subject
Transportation,Business and International Management
Reference129 articles.
1. ACSI (2017a), “Sit-down restaurants lose to fast food in customer satisfaction”, American Customer Satisfaction Index, June 20, available at: www.theacsi.org/news-and-resources/press-releases/press-2017/press-release-restaurants-2017 (accessed November 4, 2017).
2. ACSI (2017b), “The American Customer Satisfaction Index benchmarks by industry”, available at: www.theacsi.org/acsi-benchmarks/benchmarks-by-industry (accessed November 5, 2017).
3. The framesetting effects of news: an experimental test of advocacy versus objectivist frames;Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,2006
4. Does retailer CSR enhance behavioral loyalty? A case for benefit segmentation;International Journal of Research in Marketing,2014
5. Governance maturity grid: a transition method for integrating sustainability into companies?;Journal of Cleaner Production,2017
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献