Author:
Lael Joseph Nathan,Vezos Panayiotis
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of foreign exchange and interest rate changes on US banks’ stock returns.Design/methodology/approachThe approach employs an EGARCH model to account for the ARCH effects in daily returns. Most prior studies have used standard OLS estimation methods with the result that the presence of ARCH effects would have affected estimation efficiency. For comparative purposes, the standard OLS estimation method is also used to measure sensitivity.FindingsThe findings are as follows: under the conditional t‐distributional assumption, the EGARCH model generated a much better fit to the data although the goodness‐of‐fit of the model is not entirely satisfactory; the market index return accounts for most of the variation in stock returns at both the individual bank and portfolio levels; and the degree of sensitivity of the stock returns to interest rate and FX rate changes is not very pronounced despite the use of high frequency data. Earlier results had indicated that daily data provided greater evidence of exposure sensitivity.Practical implicationsAssuming that banks do not hedge perfectly, these findings have important financial implications as they suggest that the hedging policies of the banks are not reflected in their stock prices. Alternatively, it is possible that different GARCH‐type models might be more appropriate when modelling high frequency returns.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to existing knowledge in the area by showing that ARCH effects do impact on measures of sensitivity.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance
Reference37 articles.
1. Akella, S. and Chen, S. (1990), “Interest rate sensitivity of bank stock returns: specification effects and structural changes”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 13, pp. 147‐53.
2. Baillie, R. and Bollerslev, T. (1989), “The message in daily exchange rates: a conditional variance tale”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 7, pp. 297‐305.
3. Black, F. (1976), “Studies in stock price volatility changes”, Proceedings of the 1976 Business Meeting of the Business and Economics Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 177‐81.
4. Brooks, C. (1996), “Testing for non‐linearity in daily sterling exchange rates”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 6, pp. 307‐17.
5. Chamberlain, S., Howe, J., and Popper, H. (1997), “The exchange rate exposure of US and Japanese banking institutions”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 21, pp. 871‐92.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献