Abstract
PurposeEntrepreneurial exit research has overlooked the unique context of exits at retirement age when an exit marks the end of an entrepreneurial career (i.e. retirement). To better understand retirement exit decisions and transitions, this study introduces the concept of work ability (i.e. an individual’s ability to meet work demands) into the entrepreneurial exit literature and, based on role theory, hypothesises its effect and interaction with general life satisfaction in explaining the entrepreneurial exits to retirement. The study clarifies the dynamics between the voluntary and non-voluntary aspects behind exit to retirement.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression with four-wave panel data on 198 Finnish small business entrepreneurs who intend to retire to test hypotheses on the relationship between work ability, general life satisfaction and entrepreneurial exit to retirement.FindingsThe study provides partial support for the hypothesis that work ability negatively impacts entrepreneurial exit to retirement and strong support for the idea that this effect is affected by general life satisfaction. Entrepreneurs who experience higher life satisfaction are likely to retire on their own terms, whereas those less satisfied continue working until declining work ability forces them to retire.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the entrepreneurial exit literature by showing how the exit dynamics unfold in the unique context of entrepreneurial exit to retirement. The theoretical discussion opens up the potential psychological mechanisms behind such dynamics.
Reference86 articles.
1. Multiple roles and psychological well-being in a national sample of older adults;Journal of Gerontology,1994
2. The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health – a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave;Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health,2010
3. Integrating psychological resilience, stress, and coping in entrepreneurship: a critical review and research agenda;Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2022
4. Role theory perspectives: past, present, and future applications of role theories in management research;Journal of Management,2022