Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explain the difference between social inequality and identity.Design/methodology/approachThe paper presents a conceptual view.FindingsThe paper notes that the concepts are often confused, as in arguments that equality is impossible because everyone is different. It is pointed out that equality and inequality are not opposites; that equality is simply the zero point on the infinite range of inequality. The existence of inequality depends on socially recognised difference. The difference may often be simply a basis for socially imposed inequalities, as with ethnicity and gender, or it may be a real cause of inequality as with health differences. Nine important inter‐related bases of inequality are considered. Equality does not require zero inequality on all aspects but merely a balance of inequalities. However, the complexity means it is difficult to define or recognise total equality. The nearest would be that all individuals are regarded and treated as equally important. The zero point of inequality may be unattainable, but the real issue is the actual extent of inequality, which could be very substantially reduced.Originality/valueThis original paper is of value in correcting some misconceptions and improving understanding of an important subject.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference41 articles.
1. Blackburn, R.M., Brooks, B. and Jarman, J. (2001), “The vertical dimension of occupational segregation”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 311‐38.
2. Blackburn, R.M. and Jarman, J. (2004), “Segregation and inequality”, 25th CEIES Seminar –‐ Gender Statistics –‐ Occupational Segregation: Extent, Causes and Consequences, European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg, pp. 101‐10 (also GeNet 2005‐3, available at: www.genet.ac.uk/workingpapers/wpindex.htm).
3. Blackburn, R.M. and Jarman, J. (2005), “Gendered occupations: exploring the relationship between gender segregation and inequality”, International Sociology, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 289‐315.
4. Blackburn, R.M., Jarman, J. and Brooks, B. (2000), “The puzzle of gender segregation and inequality: a cross‐national analys”, European Sociological Review, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 119‐35.
5. Blau, F.D. and Hendricks, W.E. (1979), “Occupational segregation by sex: trends and prospects”, The Journal of Human Resources, Vol. XIV No. 2, pp. 197‐210.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献