Empowerment, waste and new consumption communities

Author:

Bekin Caroline,Carrigan Marylyn,Szmigin Isabelle

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore the diverse and complementary resistance and waste‐reduction practices adopted by UK‐based New Consumption Communities, and whether such behaviours empower them to achieve their environmental and social goals.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology can be broadly classified as critical ethnography, which acknowledges the researcher's own subjectivity, how the informants are treated and represented, and the study's wider context. A participant‐observer role is employed and six distinct New Consumption Communities are explored.FindingsIt is suggested that through their resistance and empowerment, as well as a reconnection to production, the communities are able to implement alternatives to the wasteful practices of mainstream consumption behaviour, and achieve (partial) autonomy from the hegemonic forces of the market.Originality/valueThis paper's original perspective on waste is not limited to a small group of consumers, and thus should interest marketers and policy makers engaged in the advancement of sustainability and green marketing.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science

Reference67 articles.

1. Anderson, J. (1996), “Yes, but is it empowerment? Initiation, implementation and outcomes of community action”, in Humphries, B. (Ed.), Critical Perspectives on Empowerment, Venture Press, Birmingham, pp. 69‐83.

2. Arnould, E.J. (1998), “Ethical concerns in participant observation/ethnography”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 72‐4.

3. Bagozzi, R.P. and Dabholkar, P.A. (1994), “Consumer recycling goals and their effect on decisions to recycle: a means‐end chain analysis”, Psychology and Marketing (1986‐1998), Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 313‐40.

4. Balch, O. (2005), “Are you smelling the right coffee?”, Guardian Unlimited, available at: www.guardian.co.uk/ ethicalbusiness/story/0,14713,1395749,00.html (accessed 24 January).

5. Bekin, C., Carrigan, M. and Szmigin, I. (2005a), “Defying marketing sovereignty: voluntary simplicity at new consumption communities”, Qualitative Market Research: an International Journal, forthcoming.

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3