The woes of Swedish private archival institutions

Author:

Svärd Proscovia

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to highlight the long-term preservation challenges that the Swedish private archives are faced with. In as much as they offer a complement to the public archives and hence offer a nuanced national narrative, they lack both financial and human resources to effectively deal with the digital information management environment. Design/methodology/approach Participatory Action Research (PAR) was used to identify the challenges of long-term preservation together with the six private archives institutions that were involved in the collaboration. The collaboration was financially facilitated by the Södertörn University. PAR is defined as a systematic investigation, with the collaboration of those affected by the issue being studied, for the purposes of education and taking action or effecting social change. What is distinctive of PAR is the active involvement of people whose lives are affected by the phenomenon under study. Findings The private archival institutions face long-term preservation challenges such as lack of a digital repository that would facilitate the capture, organization and management of digital records that are of different formats and in a dispersed environment. There are no stringent legal requirements to facilitate the creation and management of the records in a standardized way and the institutions fear that imposing such requirements might deter their clients from depositing archival materials with them. The institutions will also need to espouse the business-oriented archival descriptions where private organizations are concerned to identify relevant archival materials and to promote participatory archival descriptions that would allow the creators to tag their records with metadata. Digital information requires a proactive approach, that is, planning for the long-term preservation of the information before it is created. Private archives need to invest in education packages that will facilitate their clientele’s understanding of the challenges of digital long-term preservation. Research limitations/implications The findings cannot be generalized to all private archival institutions, as it was only six institutions that participated, but the issues discussed are relevant to most archival institutions. Practical implications A lot of research has been carried out in the area of long-term preservation, but researchers have not paid enough attention to the woes of the private archives. To sustain a nuanced national narrative, the private archives need all the support to be able to live up to their mission of preserving archives of the private sector that are not captured by the public archival institutions. This is important in a pluralistic society such as Sweden. Highlighting the challenges might enable the institutions to work towards finding common challenges. Social implications The private archives are part of Sweden’s national heritage. Their preservation matters to the society as a whole and to enhancing the voices of the underrepresented. Originality/value The literature review revealed that not much research has paid attention to the challenges being faced by the private archives. This paper, therefore, contributes to this knowledge gap.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Management Information Systems

Reference36 articles.

1. Archives in the digital age;Journal of the Society of Archivists,2004

2. Bearman, D. (1993), “Functional requirements for evidence in recordkeeping: the Pittsburgh project”, Metadata Requirements for Evidence, available at: www.archimuse.com/papers/nhprc/BACartic.html (accessed 27 August 2015).

3. Sustaining accessibility of information through digital preservation: a literature review;Journal of Information Science,2013

4. ‘We are what we keep; we keep what we are’: archival appraisal past, present and future;Journal of the Society of Archivists,2011

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Regimes of participation: theorising participatory archives from the outset of archivists' views on archival institutions and user participation in Scandinavia;Information Research an international electronic journal;2024-03-19

2. Memory Politics and Archive in South African-Russian Relations;Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services;2023-06-09

3. The Role of National Archives in the Repatriation of Liberation Archives;Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Future of Africa and Policy Development;2022-03-11

4. ÖZEL ARŞİVLERDE SAĞLAMA SÜRECİ: ARŞİVCİNİN ROLÜ;Arşiv Dünyası;2021-12-16

5. User participation: what can be learned from the information systems domain?;Records Management Journal;2019-11-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3