Combating health care fragmentation through integrated health service delivery networks in the Americas: lessons learned

Author:

Montenegro Hernán,Holder Reynaldo,Ramagem Caroline,Urrutia Soledad,Fabrega Ricardo,Tasca Renato,Alfaro Gerardo,Salgado Osvaldo,Angelica Gomes Maria

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to: analyze the challenge of health services fragmentation; present the attributes of integrated health service delivery networks (IHSDNs); review lessons learned on integration; examine recent developments in selected countries; and discuss policy implications of implementing IHSDNs.Design/methodology/approachA literature review, expert meetings, and country consultations (national, subregional, and regional) in the Americas resulted in a set of consensus‐based essential attributes for implementing IHSDNs. The analysis of 11 country case studies on integration allowed for the identification of lessons learned.FindingsStudies suggest that IHSDNs could improve health systems performance. Principal findings include: integration processes are difficult, complex, and long term; integration requires extensive systemic changes and a commitment by health workers, health service managers and policymakers; and, multiple modalities and degrees of integration can coexist within a system. The public policy objective is to propose a design that meets each system's specific organizational needs.Research limitations/implicationsThe analysis presented in this paper is qualitative.Practical implicationsSome policy implications for implementing IHSDNs are presented in the paper.Originality/valueThe research and evidence on integration remains limited. The paper expands the knowledge‐base on the topic, presenting lessons learned on integration and recent developments in selected countries, which can support integration efforts in the region.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)

Reference37 articles.

1. Aletras, V., Jones, A. and Sheldon, T.A. (1997), “Economies of scale and scope”, in Ferguson, B., Sheldon, T.A. and Posnett, J. (Eds), Concentration and Choice in Health Care, Financial Times Healthcare, London.

2. Christakis, D.A., Mell, L., Koepsell, T.D., Zummerman, F.J. and Connel, F.A. (2001), “Association of lower continuity of care with greater risk of emergency department use and hospitalization in children”, Pediatrics, Vol. 107 No. 3, pp. 524‐9.

3. Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2005), “Paris declaration on aid effectiveness”, available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/30/63/43911948.pdf (accessed May 2011).

4. Dowling, W.L. (1999), “Hospitals and health systems”, in Williams, S.J. and Torrens, P.R. (Eds), Introduction to Health Services, Delmar Publishers, Albany, NY.

5. Gillies, R.R., Shortell, S.M., Anderson, D.A., Mitchell, J.B. and Morgan, K.L. (1993), “Conceptualizing and measuring integration: findings from the health systems integration study”, Hospital & Health Services Administration, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 467‐89.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3