The value of online surveys: a look back and a look ahead

Author:

Evans Joel R.ORCID,Mathur Anil

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a detailed and critical look at the evolution of online survey research since Evans and Mathur’s (2005) article on the value of online surveys. At that time, online survey research was in its early stages. Also covered are the present and future states of online research. Many conclusions and recommendations are presented. Design/methodology/approach The look back focuses on online surveys, strengths and weaknesses of online surveys, the literature on several aspects of online surveys and online survey best practices. The look ahead focuses on emerging survey technologies and methodologies, and new non-survey technologies and methodologies. Conclusions and recommendations are provided. Findings Online survey research is used more frequently and better accepted by researchers than in 2005. Yet, survey techniques are still regularly transformed by new technologies. Non-survey digital research is also more prominent than in 2005 and can better track actual behavior than surveys can. Hybrid surveys will be widespread in the future. Practical implications The paper aims to provide insights for researchers with different levels of online survey experience. And both academics and practitioners should gain insights. Social implications Adhering to a strong ethics code is vital to gain respondents’ trust and to produce valid results. Originality/value Conclusions and recommendations are offered in these specific areas: defining concepts, understanding the future role of surveys, developing and implementing surveys and a survey code of ethics. The literature review cites more than 200 sources.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Communication

Reference242 articles.

1. Note: Lengthy URLs have been shortened using Google URL Shortener. If clicked, those URLs will open at the sites of the original URLs.

2. AAPOR (2014), “Announcing a new AAPOR initiative: furthering our understanding of today’s survey methods”, Fall, available at: https://goo.gl/rmxphT (accessed February 5, 2018).

3. AAPOR (2015), “The code of professional ethics and practices”, American Association for Public Opinion Research, November 30, available at: https://goo.gl/1t8hgv (accessed February 5, 2018).

4. AAPOR (2018a), “Best practices for survey research”, American Association for Public Opinion Research, available at: www.aapor.org/Standards-Ethics/Best-Practices.aspx#best1 (accessed February 5).

5. AAPOR (2018b), “Evaluating survey quality in today’s complex environment”, American Association for Public Opinion Research, available at: https://goo.gl/MAAqpA (accessed February 5).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3