Measuring the personal perspective on work engagement: An empirical exploration of the self-anchoring work engagement scale in Poland

Author:

Kulikowski KonradORCID

Abstract

PurposeWork engagement is among the most influential constructs in human resource management, but work engagement's current understanding overlooks what employees consider as engagement. The author aims to advance the human resources theory and practice by discussing the need for understanding engagement from the employee point of view, and the author explores the properties of a self-anchoring work engagement scale – the measure capturing the personal perspective on work engagement.Design/methodology/approachThe author has presented a conceptual discussion providing a rationale for capturing employee personal perspective on work engagement as supplementary to multi-item measures capturing researcher perspective. Based on empirical evidence, the author tests convergent and discriminant validity of self-anchoring work engagement in relation to job resources, job demands and burnout; the author confronts the nomological network of self-anchoring scale with previous work engagement meta-analysis.FindingsThe obtained results provided preliminary evidence supporting convergent and discriminant validity of self-anchoring work engagement. The analysis of the nomological network of self-anchoring work engagement in comparison to the previous meta-analysis revealed that self-anchoring work engagement might be more strongly related to challenging job demands than the multi-item researcher perspective work engagement.Research limitations/implicationsPractical implicationsSocial implicationsOriginality/valueThe author's findings provide a modicum of evidence that asking employees about self-assessment of employees' work engagement on a 0–10 scale provides researchers with access to a freely available measurement method of the personal perception on work engagement.Contribution to impact

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference74 articles.

1. Single item measures in psychological science: a call to action [Editorial];European Journal of Psychological Assessment,2022

2. Inferential statistics as descriptive statistics: there is No replication crisis if we don't expect replication;The American Statistician,2019

3. Analysis INN Apr 23 (2020), “How to calculate average variance extracted and composite reliability”, available at: https://www.analysisinn.com/post/how-to-calculate-average-variance-extracted-and-composite-reliability/ (accessed 4 April 2022).

4. APA (2020a), “Convergent-validity”, available at: https://dictionary.apa.org/convergent-validity (accessed 4 April 2022).

5. APA (2020b), “Discriminant validity”, available at: https://dictionary.apa.org/discriminant-validity (accessed 4 April 2022).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3