Author:
Kamble Rahul Ashok,Mulla Zubin
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the main and the interaction effect of follower’s professional identity and leader’s use of charismatic leadership tactics (CLTs) on follower performance and work engagement during a crisis.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors performed a 2 × 2 between subjects experiment in which both professional identity and CLTs were manipulated for a group of 320 participants.
Findings
Professional identity has a main positive effect on followers’ performance and work engagement and works as a neutralizer (counter-effect) moderator in the relationship between CLTs and work engagement during a crisis.
Research limitations/implications
Participants in the experiments were final-year engineering students and the authors manipulated only two dimensions of crisis, i.e. time urgency and high priority.
Practical implications
Organizations can strive to select for and develop professional identity amongst their members to survive crisis like situations rather than rely only on charismatic leaders.
Originality/value
This is the first study to incorporate crisis for examining a neutralizer for CLTs.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference70 articles.
1. What works for you may not work for (gen)me: limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation;The Leadership Quarterly,2017
2. Can charisma be taught? Tests of two interventions;Academy of Management Learning and Education,2011
3. Adapting leadership theory and practice for the networked, millenial generation;Journal of Leadership Studies,2011
4. They’re not girly girls’: an exploration of quantitative and qualitative data on engineering and gender in higher education;European Journal of Engineering Education,2012