1. Fox, J.
(2012), “In praise of pre-publication peer review (because post-publication review is hopeless)”, Dynamic Ecology, 11 October, available at: https://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2012/10/11/in-praise-of-pre-publication-peer-review-because-post-publication-review-is-an-utter-failure/ (accessed 15 March 2015).
2. Hojat, M.
,
Gonnella, J.S.
and
Caelleigh, A.S.
(2003), “Impartial judgment by the ‘gatekeepers’ of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process”,
Advances in Health Sciences Education
, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 75-96.
3. Hossenfelder, S.
(2015), “Open peer review and its discontents: criticism is an integral part of science – essential for progress and cohesion”, available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/02/23/open-peer-review-and-its-discontents/ (accessed 14 March 2015).
4. Meadows, A.J.
(1998),
Communicating Research
, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
5. Rowland, J.F.
(n.d.), “The peer review process. A Report to the JISC Scholarly Communications Group”, available at: www.geocities.ws/seifer_rule/Lectures/PeerReview-rowland.pdf (accessed 14 March 2015).