Author:
Li Weibao,Wu Weiwei,Yu Bo,Foo Check-Teck
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to argue for a China transmuting to fast overtake USA in innovation based on the extrapolation of past statistical trend. Case studies in self and co-innovation are provided so that the documentation of the dynamics of knowledge flows and a brain-linguistic explanation is given as to why, in the future, the Chinese are likely to lead in innovation.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper illustrates a multi-method approach in research for Chinese Management Studies. First, the sociological background of China is highlighted (Mao Zedong’s aphorism). Second, insights from OECD patent database are utilized. Third, the use of comparative research and development case-studies: self-innovation (Chinese) and co-innovation (contrasting Japanese versus French cooperation with Chinese). Fourth, is the inter-disciplinarily approach wherein the assimilating of knowledge is related to recent advances in brain research. Fifth, emphasizing the different levels in organizing for innovation: national (China), organizational (SOE), group processes and person-to-person, synapses within individual brains.
Findings
– Statistical trend suggests that China is transforming and is on the path toward overtaking the USA in innovation. When will this happen? Using extrapolation as an indication, China may surpass the USA by the 50 per cent mark within the next decade. Insights into the processes of self-innovation and co-innovation are provided. Authors argue for a brain-linguistic explanation (Hebb, 1949) for further understanding why China will eventually lead ceteris paribus innovation, a function of the human brain.
Originality/value
– This paper highlights on the basis of statistical trends (using OECD database) a rising, innovative China that is poised to overtake the USA in the near future. A major contribution is in providing insights of interactional processes required to foster innovation: self and co-innovation (comparing Japanese and French). The critical brain-linguistic role as the rationale as to why the Chinese are given a greater, more developed brain power that will eventually surpass the West in innovation.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference40 articles.
1. Archibugi, D.
and
Pietrobelli, C.
(2003), “The globalization of technology and its implications for developing countries, windows of opportunity or further burden?”,
Technological Forecasting & Social Change
, Vol. 70 No. 9, pp. 861-883.
2. Bell, M.
and
Figueiredo, P.N.
(2012), “Innovation capability building and learning mechanisms in latecomer firms: recent empirical contributions and implication for research”,
Canadian Journal of Development Studies
, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 14-40.
3. Chuang, Y.S.
(2014), “Learning and international knowledge transfer in latecomer firms: the case of Taiwan’s flat panel display industry”,
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
, Vol. 61 No. 2, pp. 261-274.
4. Damijan, J.
and
Rojec, M.
(2007), “Foreign direct investment and catching up of New EU member states: is there a flying geese pattern?”,
Applied Economics Quarterly
, Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 91-118.
5. Dutrenit, G.
(2004), “Building technological capabilities in latecomer firms: a review essay”,
Science, Technology & Society
, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 209-241.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献