How cultural differences in uncertainty avoidance affect product perceptions

Author:

Anne Lee Julie,Garbarino Ellen,Lerman Dawn

Abstract

PurposeTo examine how people from countries that vary in uncertainty avoidance (UA) use information about product uncertainty when evaluating products.Design/methodology/approachTwo studies were conducted that vary in methodology, sampling and analysis. First, an experiment was designed to manipulate product uncertainty through the use of country of origin (COO) quality‐stereotypes. It was administered to university students from a diverse range of countries, all studying in the USA. Next, data from a large‐scale survey of consumers from ten countries was submitted to hierarchical binary regression analyses to include variables at the country and individual level.FindingsThe studies support an interaction between product uncertainty (PU) and cultural UA on quality perceptions and behavioural intentions. Consumers from high UA countries evaluated high PU offerings less positively and held weaker behavioural intentions than those from low UA countries, but for low PU offerings, no difference was found. The effect of UA was reduced for people with more experience and those who were younger.Research limitations/implicationsAlthough we isolated the effects of UA from other cultural and individual level variables, it would be useful to directly cross individualism with UA in an experimental design, as these two variables are highly correlated.Practical implicationsThis study suggests products with higher levels of PU will have more opportunity to prove themselves in low uncertainty cultures.Originality/valueThis study should be valuable for marketing managers devising rollout strategies for products with higher levels of PU or weaker quality stereotypes.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing,Business and International Management

Reference49 articles.

1. Bannister, J.P. and Saunders, J.A. (1978), “UK consumers' attitudes toward imports: the measurement of national stereotype image”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 12 No. 8, pp. 562‐70.

2. Baumgartner, H. and Steenkamp, J.B.E.M. (1996), “Exploratory consumer buying behaviour: conceptualization and measurement”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 13, pp. 121‐37.

3. Bierbrauer, G., Meyer, H. and Wolfradt, U. (1994), “Measurement of normative and evaluative aspects in individualistic and collectivistic orientations: the cultural orientation scale (COS)”, in Kim, U., Triandis, H.C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S‐C. and Yoon, C. (Eds), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 189‐99.

4. Bryk, A.S. and Raudenbush, S. (1992), Hierachical Linear Models, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

5. Cattin, P., Jolibert, A. and Lohes, C. (1982), “A cross‐cultural study of made‐in concepts”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 13, pp. 131‐41.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3