Author:
Tiwari Milind,Ferrill Jamie
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to interrogate if the legal status of a cannabis affects money laundering activity. The legal status of cannabis continues to evolve globally; at the same time, its market remains enormous. Much of this market represents dirty money from criminal acts, which often requires laundering. In the context of changing cannabis regulations, legislation, and policies, the authors propose the possible implications such changes may have on the extent of money laundering.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper proposes the implications of the evolution of cannabis regulations on money laundering activities, using the theoretical underpinning of rational choice. Using Australia as a replicable critical case study, the paper, using the Walker gravity model and using United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime-reported prices of cannabis from 2003 to 2017 and Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission reports empirically validates the effects of cannabis regulations on the proceeds available for laundering.
Findings
This study finds support for the argument that prohibitive measures toward cannabis use contribute to increases in the need to launder generated proceeds.
Research limitations/implications
The findings can be replicated in other countries and may contribute to novel propositions within the debate on the legalization of cannabis use, which has, thus, far primarily focused on the areas of health, crime, taxation and education.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no study has yet attempted to provide an economic analysis of the effects of cannabis policy changes on money laundering.
Subject
Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Public Administration
Reference97 articles.
1. Money laundering as a crime in the financial sector: a new approach to quantitative assessment, with an application to Italy;Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,2014
2. Money laundering in a two-sector model: using theory for measurement;European Journal of Law and Economics,2008
3. Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) (2016), “Illicit drug data report 2014–15”, available at: www.acic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2016/08/acic-iddr-2014-15.pdf?v=1561619004
4. Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) (2017), “Illicit drug data report 2015–16”, available at: www.acic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2017/06/illicit_drug_data_report_2015-16_full_report.pdf?v=1561618955
5. Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) (2018), “Illicit drug data report 2016–17”, available at: www.acic.gov.au/sites/default/files/iddr_2016-17_050718.pdf?v=1561090189
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献