Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to discuss the compliance duties of Swiss banks toward the Chinese exchange control in case of PRC residents’ deposits.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper matches the Swiss regulatory framework and practice in matter of banks diligence with that of the PRC exchange control and tentatively identifies the consequences resulting thereof for Swiss banks.
Findings
The paper finds that exchange control does fall within the scope of the Diligence Code. It suggests that banks should broadly interpret the related provisions. While in case of infringement, Chinese penalties can still be rated as a remote and moderate threat, they might strengthen. Meanwhile, the Swiss ones, under the Code, are serious.
Research limitations/implications
The paper does not cover other forms of overseas investment from China, namely, commercial investment. Besides, there is no related jurisprudence or practice as of yet; therefore, the findings of the paper need to be tested.
Practical implications
The paper suggests that the compliance officers of Swiss banks should familiarize themselves with the specificities of the PRC exchange control to anticipate the related risks.
Originality/value
Sino-Swiss compliance and bilateral assistance in financial matters are still unchartered waters. Because the Greater China market is of growing significance for Swiss banks, they might welcome early guidance to avoid repeating their mistakes with the USA and the EU.
Subject
Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Public Administration
Reference4 articles.
1. Friedli, G. (2016), “Praxis der aufsichtskommission zur sorgfaltspflicht der banken 2005-2010”, SwissBanking, available at: www.swissbanking.org/fr/themes/actualite/lutte-contre-le-blanchiment-dargent/20110110-3610-all-taetikeitsbericht_2005_2010_fr.pdf/view (accessed 13 March 2016).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献