Abstract
PurposeScientific collaboration is becoming a common pattern in the social organization of knowledge production. The paper tries to figure out the relationship between scientific collaboration team size and scientific output.Design/methodology/approachBased on ESI database from year 2009–2019, the paper describes changes of collaboration team size from one author to more than 10 authors in 22 disciplines. Kernel density estimation and multidimensional kernel density estimation method are used to calculate optimal collaboration team size and appropriate collaboration team size in 22 disciplines. As bandwidth is one of the major issues in construction of kernel density estimation, the paper uses five different algorithms to calculate bandwidth. The method with the lowest mean absolute percentage error is chosen. Robustness test is conducted based on different sets of data.FindingsThe results show that scientific collaboration becomes more widely and deeply. As time goes by, collaboration team size is becoming larger and larger. Natural science disciplines have larger collaboration team size and faster growth rate than social science disciplines. Considering both qualitative and quantitative measures, the paper proves the universality of optimal and appropriate scientific collaboration team size among 22 disciplines and calculates the specific number.Originality/valueThe paper tries to investigate the law of scientific collaboration team size variation and provide a full picture of evolution of collaboration team size among 22 disciplines in 10 years. The paper first applies distribution method to figure out the relationship between scientific collaboration team size and scientific output and provides optimal collaboration team size and appropriate collaboration team size.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference62 articles.
1. Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation?;Higher Education,2009
2. International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia: a comparison between Europe and the USA;Technovation,2004
3. An empirical investigation of the influence of collaboration in Finance on article impact;Scientometrics,2013
4. Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition,2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. New classes of density estimates of low bias;Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics;2023-09