Author:
Cornish Sally,Preston-Shoot Michael
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of the paper is to report the findings from research into the governance of adult protection in Scotland, with particular focus on the outcomes of provision for multi-agency leadership and management of adult safeguarding in the Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007. Comparisons will be drawn between these findings and the evidence on the governance of adult safeguarding in England.
Design/methodology/approach
– The study comprised a thematic analysis of Adult Protection Committee (APC) biennial reports on implementation of the 2007 Act to the Scottish Government, associated documentation, and key informant interviews with professionals involved in adult protection leadership and practice.
Findings
– A rich and complex pattern of arrangements, activities, experiences and challenges were identified across a number of dimensions, including management structures of APCs, development of policies and procedures, multi-agency working, training, performance assessment and quality management, engagement of service users and carers and operation of the 2007 Act.
Research limitations/implications
– Service users and carers were not directly involved in the documentary review or key informant interviews. There remains a need to investigate the impacts on practice and service user experience of different forms of governance of adult protection arrangements.
Practical implications
– The paper identifies outcomes and challenges in respect of multi-agency approaches to governance taken by APCs in Scotland.
Originality/value
– The paper offers the first formal evaluation of governance of adult protection systems in Scotland and includes comparative analysis with research findings on the governance of adult safeguarding in England.
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference49 articles.
1. Act Against Harm
( 2009), “Adult Support and Protection: Ensuring Support and Preventing Harm”, available at: www.actagainstharm.org (accessed 6 August 2012).
2. Audit Commission
(2009), Corporate Governance: Improvement and Trust in Local Public Services, Audit Commission, London.
3. Braye, S.
,
Orr, D.
and
Preston-Shoot, M.
(2012), “The governance of adult safeguarding: findings from research”, Journal of Adult Protection, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 55-72.
4. Brodie, I.
,
Nottingham, C.
and
Plunkett, S.
(2008), “A tale of two reports: social work in Scotland from social work and the community (1996) to changing lives (2006)”, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 697-715.
5. Burgess, H.
and
Carpenter, J.
(2008), “Building capacity and capability for evaluating the outcomes of social work education (the OSWE Project): creating a culture change”, Social Work Education, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 898-912.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献