Author:
Oakley Lisa Ruth,Fenge Lee-Ann,Bass Simon,Humphreys Justin
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to report the findings from a study exploring the understanding of vulnerability and adult safeguarding within Christian faith-based settings. The paper concludes with recommendations for practitioners involved in safeguarding adults in faith-based Christian settings.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper considers a survey (n=3,182) into understanding of vulnerability and adult safeguarding for individuals who attend Church regularly or work in a Christian organisation
Findings
– This study is the first to be undertaken with a UK sample and highlights a range of factors informing adult safeguarding practice within Christian organisations. This includes: complexity linked to understanding vulnerability and its role in safeguarding activity; lack of clarity about what to do with a safeguarding adult concern; and the need for safeguarding training pertinent to the particular needs of faith-based settings.
Research limitations/implications
– As there is currently a dearth of research in this area this paper makes a valuable contribution to the developing knowledge base around safeguarding and vulnerability within faith-based organisations.
Practical implications
– Professionals need to develop increased understanding of the complexities involved in safeguarding activity, and specifically how those working in the wider context of supporting vulnerable adults make sense of safeguarding processes and procedures.
Social implications
– It is important that all organisations, including faith-based settings, working with adults have an understanding of their roles and responsibilities with respect to safeguarding those at risk of harm.
Originality/value
– This paper is the first UK study to consider safeguarding adults at risk of harm in Christian faith contexts.
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference44 articles.
1. Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act
(2007), available at: www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2007/10/pdfs/asp_20070010_en.pdf (accessed 5 January 2016).
2. Allen, V.
and
Brodzinski, E.
(2009), “Deconstructing the toolkit: creativity and risk in the NHS workforce”,
Health Care Analysis
, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 309-17.
3. Böhm, B.
,
Zollner, H.
,
Fegert, J.M.
and
Liebhardt, H.
(2014), “Child sexual abuse in the context of the Roman Catholic Church: a review of literature from 1981-2013”,
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 635-56.
4. Boland, B.
,
Burnage, J.
and
Scott, A.
(2014), “Safeguarding adults at risk of harm”,
Clinical Medicine
, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 345-8.
5. BPS
(2007), “Guidelines for ethical practice in psychological research”, available at: www.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/conducting_research_on_the_internet-guidelines_for_ethical_practice_in_psychological_research_online.pdf (accessed 6 November 2014).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献