Abstract
PurposeIn a complex, ever-changing, and turbulent business world, encouraging employees to express their improvement-oriented novel ideas through voice behavior is crucial for organizations to survive and thrive. Understanding how to foster employee promotive voice at work is a significant issue for both researchers and managers. This study explores how to foster employee promotive voice through specific HRM practices and positive employee attitudes. It also examines the effect of employee promotive voice on perceived organizational performance.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed a time-lagged multisource survey design. Data were collected from 215 executives, 790 supervisors, and 1,004 employees in 113 firms, and analyzed utilizing a multilevel moderated serial mediation model.FindingsThe findings of this study revealed that promotive voice was significantly related to perceived organizational performance. Innovation-enhancing HRM was positively associated with employee promotive voice. The HRM-voice relationship was partially mediated by employee job satisfaction. Power distance orientation was found to significantly moderate the relationship between innovation-enhancing HRM and employee job satisfaction at the firm level. Our findings showed that innovation-enhancing HRM policies may fail to foster promotive voice if they do not enhance employee job satisfaction.Originality/valueThis study challenges some taken-for-granted assumptions in the literature such as any high performance HRM bundles (e.g. HPWS) can foster employee promotive voice, and the effects of HRM are direct and even unconditional on organizational outcomes. It emphasizes the need to avoid potential unintended effects of HRM on employee voice and the importance of contextualizing voice research.
Reference86 articles.
1. HRD and HRM perspectives on organizational performance: a review of literature;Human Resource Development Review,2013
2. Enhancing employee voice and inclusion through inclusive leadership in public sector organizations;Public Personnel Management,2022
3. Allen, M. (2014), “Hirschman and voice”, in Wilkinson, A., Donaghey, J., Dundon, T. and Freeman, R. (Eds), The Handbook of Research on Employee Voice, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 36-51.
4. Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach;Psychological Bulletin,1988
5. Asparouhov, T. and Muthén, B. (2018), “SRMR in Mplus”, available at: https://www.statmodel.com/download/SRMR2.pdf