Management research worldwide: extent and determinants (1996-2010)

Author:

Gantman Ernesto R.

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to explore the extent and determinants of the production of scientific management and organization studies (SMOS). Design/methodology/approach – This paper is a quantitative analysis of bibliometric data. Findings – The results of a comparison of number of authorships in a broad number of journals reveal that the share of the US production in the field is declining. However, the visibility of authors from developing countries remains at an extremely low level. Regarding the analysis of the determinants of academic production in the discipline, the estimated count data models highlight the relevance of economic, linguistic and political factors, which have a positive and highly significant effect on the countries’ published research output. Practical implications – The concluding section discusses how the quantity and quality of SMOS in developed countries could be improved. Originality/value – The paper presents new evidence about the unequal distribution of the countries’ production in SMOS as well as on its determining factors.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference65 articles.

1. Alatas, S.F. (2009), “Religion and reform: two exemplars for autonomous sociology in the non-Western context”, in Patel, S. (Ed.), The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions , Sage, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 29-39.

2. Archambault, E. , Vignola-Gagne, E. , Côté, G. , Larivière, V. and Gingras, Y. (2006), “Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: the limits of existing databases”, Scientometrics , Vol. 68 No. 3, pp. 329-342.

3. Bajnar, O. and Kipping, M. (Eds) (1998), The Americanization of European Business: The Marshall Plan and the Transfer of US Management Models , Routdelge, London.

4. Baruch, Y. (2001), “Global or North American? A geographical based comparative analysis of publications in top management journals”, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management , Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 109-126.

5. Bennis, W.G. and O’Toole, J. (2005), “How business schools lost their way”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 83 No. 5, pp. 96-104.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3