Author:
Sallos Mark Paul,Garcia-Perez Alexeis,Bedford Denise,Orlando Beatrice
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to frame organisational cybersecurity through a strategic lens, as a function of an interplay of pragmatism, inference, holism and adaptation. The authors address the hostile epistemic climate for intellectual capital management presented by the dynamics of cybersecurity as a phenomenon. The drivers of this hostility are identified and their implications for research and practice are discussed.
Design/methodology/approach
The philosophical foundations of cybersecurity in its relation with strategy, knowledge and intellectual capital are explored through a review of the literature as a mechanism to contribute to the emerging theoretical underpinnings of the cybersecurity domain.
Findings
This conceptual paper argues that a knowledge-based perspective can serve as the necessary platform for a phenomenon-based view of organisational cybersecurity, given its multi-disciplinary nature.
Research limitations/implications
By recognising the knowledge-related vectors, mechanisms and tendencies at play, a novel perspective on the topic can be developed: cybersecurity as a “knowledge problem”. In order to facilitate such a perspective, the paper proposes an emergent epistemology, rooted in systems thinking and pragmatism.
Practical implications
In practice, the knowledge-problem narrative can underpin the development of new organisational support constructs and systems. These can address the distinctiveness of the strategic challenges that cybersecurity poses for the growing operational reliance on intellectual capital.
Originality/value
The research narrative presents a novel knowledge-based analysis of organisational cybersecurity, with significant implications for both interdisciplinary research in the field, and practice.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Reference77 articles.
1. Allen, P. and Boulton, J. (2011), “Complexity and limits to knowledge: the importance of uncertainty”, in Allen, P., Maguire, S. and McKelvey, B. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Complexity and Management, Sage Publications, London, pp. 164-181.
2. Complexity and the limits to learning;Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2007
3. Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: spare change, everyone?;Strategic Organization,2009
4. Baraniuk, C. (2015), “Ashley Madison: ‘Suicides’ over website hack [online]”, available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34044506 (accessed 24 May 2018).
5. Toward a complexity theory of information systems development;Information Technology & People,2006
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献