Author:
Lucey Thomas A.,Grant Michael M.
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore a framework for considering moral K‐12 instructional technology. It seeks to examine the extent that development of technology policies consider and respect affected parties' interests.Design/methodology/approachInterpreting morality as an economic concept that involves a reconciliation of societal members' diverse needs and wants, the authors describe moral instruction technology use as a negotiation of administrative, teaching and learning needs along five continua defined by Mason, in 1986 and Peace and Hartzel in 2002: property, freedom of speech, privacy, accessibility, and accountability. The paper commences with observations concerning research into technology‐based empowerment and associated ethical issues. It then describes the five continua of ethical instructional technology challenges within the contexts of K‐12 settings.FindingsThe authors encourage research through observational and survey studies to clarify understandings of these continua. Although presented separately, they acknowledge that these dimensions overlap and interact to comprise a mesh of moral dilemmas. If morality represents a concept designed to balance societal powers, then implementation of moral instructional technology processes respects the views of all educators. The authors argue that how educators interpret technology's placements along these moral continua have important consequences for practice. They encourage research that interprets these relationships and how they may best support classroom processes.Originality/valueThe paper presents an exploratory framework, offering insights into ethical issues in instructional technology.
Reference66 articles.
1. Alhola‐Sidaway, J. and McKinnon, M. (1999), “Fostering pedagogical soundness of multimedia learning methods”, Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 67‐86.
2. Allen, N., Resta, P.E. and Christal, M. (2002), “Technology and tradition: the role of technology in Native American schools”, Techtrends, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 50‐5.
3. Bacigalupa, C. (2008), “Why children's interpretations of stories with moral themes often differ from adult interpretations, and why those differences are important”, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
4. Bennett, L. (2005), “Guidelines for using technology in the social studies classroom”, Social Studies, Vol. 1 No. 96, pp. 38‐40.
5. Bergman, R. (2002), “Why be moral? A conceptual model from developmental psychology”, Human Development, Vol. 45, pp. 104‐24.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献