Analysing the parameters of the duty of reasonable adjustment to facilitate access to e‐learning resources

Author:

van Hoorebeek Mark,Walker Stuart,Dermo John

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the parameters of the duty of reasonable adjustment to facilitate access to e‐learning resources.Design/methodology/approachEducational providers continue to develop new methods of delivering content in digital format, the increasing use of broadband, web‐based resources and new content creation software provides numerous methods of delivering excellence in content creation and delivery. It is important that this excellence is available to all; to this end the disability aspects of e‐learning provision are discussed in this paper, specifically relating to a anticipatory “duty of reasonable adjustment” to facilitate access to computer‐based learning resources within the UK education sector.FindingsThe paper concludes that the concept of reasonable adjustment is likely to remain unclear within the current statutory framework, is dynamic in relation to e‐learning software applications, and will continue to increase in scope and complexity as advanced software applications are used on a larger scale in the education sector.Practical implicationsAfter relating general accessibility approaches to the various open and proprietary source software applications and the concept of “lock in,” the paper argues that knowledge of reasonable adjustment is optimally considered in the early planning stage of development rather than after implementation, under the legislatively mandated anticipatory model. Further conclusions are presented which propose that the approaches described can be scaled up to provide general themes, which benefits the full spectrum of disability alongside the wider student cohort.Originality/valueFurther work is discussed and includes a potential UK extension of the analysis presented by Scroggins in 2007 concerning measurement and structural modeling of reasonableness under the provisions of the US Rehabilitation Act of 1998 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education

Reference29 articles.

1. Action on Access (2009), available at: www.actiononaccess.org/?p=1_3 (accessed 11 February 2009).

2. BlackBoard (2009), available at: www.blackboard.com/company/accessibility.aspx (accessed 8 February 2009).

3. Davies, M. (2003), “The Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001: the implications for higher education”, Education and the Law, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 19‐45.

4. Dearnley, C. and Walker, S. (2009), “Mobile enabled research”, in Vavoula, G. (Ed.), Researching Mobile Learning: Frameworks, Methods and Research Designs, Peter Lang, Oxford, pp. 353‐65.

5. Disability Discrimination (2008), Revised Code of Practice for Trade Organisations, Qualification Bodies and General Qualifications Bodies by Equality and Human Rights Commission and Disability Rights Commission, 1 May, available at: www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/publicationsandresources/Pages/DisabilitycopforTradeOrganisations.aspx (accessed 12 February 2009).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Computer-Assisted Learning Based on Universal Design, Multimodal Presentation and Textual Linkage;Journal of the Knowledge Economy;2016-03-31

2. A Universal Design Infrastructure for Multimodal Presentation of Materials in STEM Programs;Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web;2015-05-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3