Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this article is to document and analyse the information network available to municipal mayors in Norwegian municipalities and environmental officers in the municipal administration, covering both public and private information sources.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on a quantitative methodology. Survey data from a sample of all Norwegian municipalities are analysed, and explorative statistics, correlations and regression analysis are applied.FindingsThe most important information sources for Norwegian mayors are science, the County governor's environmental department and the municipal environmental officer, with consultancy playing a minor role. In the case of science, it is noticeable that females, central municipalities, and the disciplines of humanities and environment contribute to the strong position of science. Furthermore, the left axis of politics increases the quantity of intra‐municipal information sources. The most important contact points for the environmental officer are the County Governor and other primary municipalities. The county municipality, consultancy and research are of lesser importance. It is noticeable that full‐time environmental officers have a broader climate change information network than part‐time officers. Furthermore, a higher level of education is linked to increased interaction with other public sector actors.Practical implicationsThe study documents a multi‐level governance of networking. The differences between full‐time and part‐time environmental officers should stimulate a debate and motivate further research to determine whether funding full‐time positions by the central government could foster more effective local climate change policies.Originality/valueThe study's value lies in its contribution to the climate governance literature, deepening our understanding of the role of different information sources and actors in facilitating sound climate change and environmental policies.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Development,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference33 articles.
1. Aall, C., Groven, K. and Lindseth, G. (2007), “The scope of action for local climate policy: the case of Norway”, Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 83‐101.
2. Aftenposten (2010), “Nordmenn har svært stor tro på forskning, viser en fersk europeisk undersøkelse(“Very high confidence in research among Norwegians, according to a recent European poll”)”, available at: www.aftenposten.no/kul_und/article3737060.ece (accessed 31 July 2010).
3. Amundsen, H., Berglund, F. and Westskog, H. (2010), “Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation – a question of multilevel governance?”, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 276‐89.
4. Berglund, F. and Nergaard, E. (2008), “Utslippsreduksjoner og tilpasninger – klimatiltak i norske kommuner (“Reducing greenhouse gas emission and adapting to climate change – climate measures in Norwegian municipalities”)”, NIBR Report 2008:103, Norwegian Institute for Regional and Urban Research, Oslo.
5. Betsill, M. and Bulkeley, H. (2007), “Looking back and thinking ahead: a decade of cities and climate change research”, Local Environment, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 447‐56.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献