Author:
Barrett Peter,Barrett Lucinda
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to highlight the key characteristics of the highest‐performing construction projects, so that future procurement, briefing, design and construction management processes can be improved in the light of these experiences.Design/methodology/approachWorkshops were carried out in Australia, Singapore and the USA involving 40 senior participants, representing a good cross‐section of the stakeholder interests around construction. These individuals were each asked to identify the best construction project with which they had been involved at any point in their careers and to identify the major reasons for its success.FindingsA synthesis is provided of the characteristics that characterise the exemplary projects cited by the workshop participants. These are typified by the “4Cs”, namely constraints driving collaboration and creativity, ideally leading to community benefits. The 17 exemplars provided by the participants show project teams facing demands that act to break the dysfunctional paradigm of normal practice, so allowing refreshing and motivating actions to follow. This schema is reinforced by the three case study vignettes that illustrate in more detail the factors at work and their interactions. Linkage to prominent issues apparent in the literatures related to procurement, briefing, design and construction management are shown, together with pointers as to the connections between these issues as experienced in specific real world, project situations. In particular, the potentially pervasive impact of selective priority‐setting is highlighted.Practical implicationsThis paper provides a glimpse of how construction operates at its best, the industry explicitly contributing to, and getting credit for, adding value to society economically, but also culturally, socially and environmentally.Originality/valueThe work reported on here covers 17 mini‐cases and three fuller cases, all drawn from three countries. Further work to build additional cases from a wider range of countries would test the broad outline of the 4Cs model and increase one's understanding of the dynamic mechanisms at work.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Building and Construction,Architecture,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference38 articles.
1. Ang, K.I. (2004), Competing Revaluing Construction Paradigms in Practice, CIB Report, CIB, Rotterdam.
2. Ballard, G. and Howell, G.A. (2003), “Lean project management”, Building Research and Information, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 119‐33.
3. Barlow, J., Childerhouse, P., Gann, D., Hong‐Minh, S., Naim, M. and Ozaki, R. (2003), “Choice and delivery in housebuilding: lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders”, Building Research and Information, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 134‐45.
4. Barrett, P.S. (2005), Revaluing Construction – A Global Agenda, CIB Publication No. 305, CIB, Rotterdam.
5. Barrett, P.S. and Barrett, L.C. (2004), “Research as a kaleidoscope on practice”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 21 No. 7, pp. 755‐66.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献