Evaluation of flexibility in capital investments of infrastructure systems

Author:

Arboleda Carlos A.,Abraham Dulcy M.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a methodology to evaluate the capital investments in infrastructure projects managed by private operators considering uncertainties in the operation and maintenance of the infrastructure components.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology described in this paper is based on two major sources of information: deterioration curves of the infrastructure systems obtained from Markov chain models and the value of flexibility obtained from a real options analysis.FindingsUsing this methodology, it is possible to determine whether there is value if project managers adopt flexible strategies in determining capital investments. These strategies refer to the opportunities of postponing, deferring or canceling capital investments required to maintain the operation of the infrastructure systems.Research limitations/implicationsThe model utilizes Monte Carlo simulation and real options analysis to overcome the complexities associated with the solution of the differential equations that represent the variability of the main factors in the project cash flow.Originality/valueThe methodology presented in this paper can be used by public officials, private investors, and asset managers to determine the value of flexibility associated with the strategies required to maintain the operation of infrastructure assets.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Building and Construction,Architecture,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference24 articles.

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (2005), “Report card for America's infrastructure”, available at: www.asce.org/reportcard/2005/index.cfm (accessed March 31, 2005).

2. Baietti, A. and Raymond, P. (2005), Financing Water Supply and Sanitation Investments: Utilizing Risk Mitigation Instruments to Bridge the Financing Gap, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

3. Baik, H. (2003), “Development of an asset valuation model for wastewater infrastructure assets”, PhD thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

4. Barlow, M. and Ehrhardt, S. (2004), “A debate on water privatization”, Grist Magazine, available at: www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2004/07/12/barlow/ (accessed April 20, 2005).

5. Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973), “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, May/June, pp. 637‐54.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3