Fostering safe work behaviour in workers at construction sites

Author:

Ai Lin Teo Evelyn,Yean Yng Ling Florence,Sern Yau Ong Derrick

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose and test a framework to foster safe work behaviour among workers on construction sites.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed framework identifies two main reasons for unsafe behaviours: “don't know how”, and “don't care”. Technical and safety training is proposed to overcome the former problem, while for the latter it is proposed that organisations systematically apply operant conditioning techniques to promote safety, using organisational behaviour modification. A postal survey of contractors in Singapore was conducted to test the framework. The four tools of operant conditioning theory (positive reinforcements, negative reinforcements, extinction, and punishments) were evaluated.FindingsClose and strict supervision, sending workers for safety and health training, and imposing fines are found to be most effective methods. Positive reinforcements (both monetary and non‐monetary) have also been found to be effective, while extinction did not receive much support. Other methods that may foster safe work behaviours are also discussed.Originality/valueSafety on site could be enhanced via training and application of operant conditioning theory.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Building and Construction,Architecture,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference26 articles.

1. Dragoi, V. and Staddon, J.E.R. (1999), “The dynamics of operant conditioning”, Psychological Review, Vol. 106 No. 1, pp. 20‐61.

2. Gibb, A.G.F. and Foster, M. (1996), “Safety motivation: evaluation of incentive schemes”, in Alves, D.L.M. and Coble, R. (Eds), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of CIB WC W99 Implementation of Safety and Health on Construction Site Lisbon, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 405‐15.

3. Haines, V.Y. III, Merrheim, G. and Roy, M. (2001), “Understanding reactions to safety incentives”, Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 17‐30.

4. Hamner, W.C. (1990), “Reinforcement theory and contingency management in organizational settings”, in Tosi, H. and Hamner, W.C. (Eds), Organizational Behavior and Management: A Contingency Approach, PWS‐Kent, Boston, MA, pp. 10‐19.

5. Helander, G.M. (1991), “Safety hazards and motivation for safe work in the construction industry”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 205‐23.

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3