LIFT psychology primary care group for people with intellectual disabilities: can IAPT adapt?

Author:

Kirk Jo,Sehmi Aneet,Hazeldine Charlotte,Palmer Gemma,Ruddle Georgina

Abstract

Purpose – There is a move to make primary care models of mental health care more accessible to people with intellectual disabilities (IAPT, 2009) but little evidence of their ability of services to make the necessary reasonable adjustments or their effectiveness (Dodd et al., 2011). The purpose of this paper is to describe a pilot project to evaluate an anxiety management group co-facilitated by Least Intervention First Time (LIFT) Psychology and Community Team for People with Learning Disabilities (CTPLD) services. Design/methodology/approach – Five people attended a nine-week anxiety management group, adapted from a course offered by LIFT services. The Glasgow Anxiety Scale (GAS-ID) and a skills and knowledge assessment were completed pre-group, post-group and follow-up to evaluate outcome and consider the ability of LIFT to make reasonable adjustments to deliver effective services for people with intellectual disabilities. Findings – Participants showed no significant reduction in anxiety levels but improvements in their skills and knowledge. An evaluation of the adjustments to make the group accessible for people with intellectual disabilities identified that some were feasible if offering the group on a long-term basis, and others were not. The viability of future groups is considered. Originality/value – The paper looks at the viability of making reasonable adjustments to psychoeducational groups within Improving Access to Psychological Therapies services to better meet the needs of people with intellectual disabilities, an area of limited research. It raises dilemmas and considerations for the future development of such services.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference39 articles.

1. Aspire (2010), “The big debate: IAPT is bad for the profession of clinical psychology”, available at: www.clinpsy.org.uk/aspire (accessed 11 April 2013).

2. Bramston, P. , Bostock, J. and Tehan, G. (1993), “The measurement of stress in people with an intellectual disability”, International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 95-104.

3. Brown, A. (1992), Groupwork, 3rd ed., Ashgate Publishers, Aldershot.

4. Coles, S. , Diamond, B. and Keenan, S. (2009), “Clinical psychology in psychiatric services: the magician's assistant?”, Clinical Psychology Forum, No. 198, pp. 5-10.

5. Cooper, S.-A. , Smiley, E. , Morrison, J. , Williamson, J. and Allan, L. (2007), “Mental ill-health in adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence and associated factors”, British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 190 No. 1, pp. 27-35.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3