Developing and piloting the QOMID – quality outcome measure for individuals with intellectual disabilities and dementia

Author:

Dodd Karen,Bush Alick,Livesey Alexandra

Abstract

Purpose – Outcome measurement is a key priority for services. There are no papers on specific overall quality outcome measures for people with intellectual disabilities who have dementia. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and piloting of a new measure. Design/methodology/approach – A process was developed to measure quality outcomes across all stages of dementia. The reliability of the tool was measured using Cronbach’s α coefficients, along with data about its clinical utility. Findings – The QOMID has good reliability, face validity and internal reliability suggesting that all domains contribute equally towards the construct of quality outcome. An exploratory factor analysis revealed that there may be four or five sub-factors within the QOMID, The clinical utility of the assessment tool was explored and it can be concluded that the QOMID is simple, fairly quick and effective. Research limitations/implications – The scale has good psychometric properties and the initial parameters for the QOMID were met. Further exploration of factors needs to be considered with a larger sample of participants. Practical implications – The scale was liked by assessors and gives a practical tool that can both measure the quality outcome for people at each stage of their dementia, and help to develop more effective care plans. Originality/value – This is the first measure to look at quality outcomes for people with intellectual disabilities and dementia and which takes a staged approach.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference46 articles.

1. Acton, G.J. and Kang, J. (2001), “Interventions to reduce the burden of caregiving for an adult with dementia: a meta-analysis”, Research in Nursing & Health , Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 349-60.

2. Alzheimer’s Australia (2007), “Quality dementia care standards: a guide to practice for managers in residential aged care facilities”, available at: www.fightdementia.org.au/common/files/NAT/20070200_Nat_QDC_QDC2QualDemCareStandards.pdf (accessed 18 February 2015).

3. Banerjee, S. , Samsi, K. , Petrie, C.D. , Alvir, J. , Treglia, M. , Schwam, E.M. and del Valle, M. (2009), “What do we know about quality of life in dementia? A review of the emerging evidence on the predictive and explanatory value of disease specific measures of health related quality of life in people with dementia”, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry , Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 15-24.

4. Bartlett, M.S. (1954), “A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society , Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 296-8.

5. British Psychological Society (1992), Steering Committee on Test Standards , BPS, Leicester.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3