Author:
Nsibande Mduduzi,Boshoff Douw Gert Brand
Abstract
Purpose
The South African listed property market has changed its legal basis from property loan stock companies and property unit trusts to adopt the more familiar international structure, real estate investment trusts. The main distinction is how shareholding is structured and investment returns are paid out to shareholders, which results in a different tax treatment. It is hoped that this change would attract more foreign investment, but it is questionable if this is sufficient to convince global investors who, amidst a seeming worsening of the stability in the political and economic environment, would probably need more insight into aspects such as investment decision making within these South African organisations. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
Using a balanced scorecard (BSC) framework, this study investigates the relevance of investment decision-making frameworks in South Africa. A survey using a sample of institutional investors that are included in the South African Property Market Index was conducted.
Findings
The study found similarities in decision-making priorities of South African institutional investors to those of previous studies. With the focus on retail property, tenant mix and secondary to that, quality of the centre management team is found to be important for forecasting expected returns in a retail investment decision environment. Diversification strategies were found to have similar results to previous studies, leaning more towards geographic location than economic location. Further, the study suggested the use of a BSC framework, linking the financial information and different financial ratios to nonfinancial aspects that need specific consideration in a retail investment environment.
Research limitations/implications
Retail property is considered to be of particular concern due to the business enterprise value that could be created if superior management techniques are applied. The investment decision stage concerned with forecasting expected returns relies on financial and quantitative models such as those derived from Modern Portfolio Theory. In a shopping mall environment, however, future performance is driven by nonfinancial factors, for example, tenant mix and superior customer experience. Therefore, forecasting expected returns in a retail environment requires a nuanced approach relative to other commercial property sectors.
Originality/value
The paper is considered to be original in its analysis of the retail real estate market in South Africa. This offers new insight into retail properties specifically, but also how investors in South Africa react to decision-making practices. This adds value in the internationalisation of the property market and the consistency and transparent practices applied globally.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance
Reference56 articles.
1. When income matters: customers evaluation of shopping malls’ hedonic and utilitarian orientations;Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,2009
2. Decision theory and real estate development: a note on uncertainty;Journal of European Real Estate Research,2008
3. Beattie, A. (2013), “African opportunities: balancing risk and reward”, available at: www.financialmail.co.za/specialreports/propertyhandbook/2013/07/26/african-opportunities-balancing-risk-and-reward (accessed 19 August 2013).
4. Evidence of shareholder activism and information deficiency in the listed property sector in South Africa,2012
5. A decision support on planning retail tenant mix in shopping malls;Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences,2011
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献