Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to specify the role of emotions played in information seeking and sharing taking place in online discussion forum. To this end, an explorative study was made that focussed on consumer awareness.
Design/methodology/approach
– The study is based on the analysis of a sample of 30 discussion threads containing altogether 1,630 messages available in Canadian Content – a major online platform. The expression of emotions was examined by using the categories of the interaction process analysis (IPA) model. Two research questions were addressed: first, what kind of emotions are expressed in the four functional areas of the IPA model when discussing online about consumer awareness? and second, what is the role of positive and negative emotions in information seeking and sharing about the above topic? The data were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis.
Findings
– Of the emotional expressions, 42 percent were positive and 58 percent negative. The most frequent emotions were amusement, contempt, worry, irritation and pleasure. The frequencies of positive and emotional expressions varied in the context of 12 IPA categories. Positive emotions predominated when participants showed solidarity or agreed, while negative emotions were particularly prevalent when indicating antagonism. The repertoire of positive and negative emotions was broadest while providing opinions or sharing information with others. In contrast, emotions were expressed rarely in the context of information seeking.
Research limitations/implications
– The study is explorative in nature and the findings are based on the examination of an online discussion group focussed on the issues of consumer awareness.
Originality/value
– The study contributes to the study of affective factors in computer-mediated interaction by empirically specifying the repertoire of positive and negative emotions expressed in online discussion.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference45 articles.
1. Ayeh, J.K.
,
Au, N.
and
Law, R.
(2013), “Do we believe in TripAdvisor? Examining credibility perceptions and online travelers’ attitude toward using user-generated content”,
Journal of Travel Research
, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 437-452.
2. Bales, R.F.
(1950a),
Interaction Process Analysis. A Method for the Study of Small Groups
, Addison-Wesley Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Bales, R.F.
(1950b), “A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction”,
American Sociological Review
, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 257-263.
4. Ben-Zéev, A.
and
Revhon, N.
(2004), “Emotional complexity in everyday life”,
Social Science Information
, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 581-589.
5. Blackshaw, M.
and
Nazzaro, M.
(2006),
Consumer-Generated Media (CGM) 101: Word-of-Mouth in the Age of the Web-Fortified Consumer
, Nielsen BuzzMetrics, New York, NY.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献