Strategic planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation: the case of Greece
Author:
Spyridi Dimitra,Vlachokostas Christos,Michailidou Alexandra V.,Sioutas Constantinos,Moussiopoulos Nicolas
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to put forward a methodological framework to provide a comparative assessment of available mitigation and adaptation strategies against climate change. Mitigation options aim at minimizing CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions, in an effort to reduce the rate of increase in global temperature. On the other hand, adaptation options relate to the ability of the natural or human systems to handle the impact of the climate change and to adjust to its effects, seeking to eliminate the adverse consequences and take advantage of any beneficial outcomes.
Design/methodology/approach
– The methodology focuses on specific parameters, leading to the most efficient package of alternatives for the area of Greece. The selection of the “optimal” ranking of alternatives in a defined strategy is a sophisticated procedure, and a multi-criteria decision-making process was established. A questionnaire was designed and used as input to the overall framework, based on specific decision criteria. Climate change experts gave their feedback via a face-to-face interview. ELECTRE III multi-criteria decision analysis was adopted for the comparative evaluation, as it fits best to complex environmental problems. An “optimal” sequence of mitigation and adaptation strategies was provided for Greece.
Findings
– The use of renewable energy sources, increase of energy efficiency and improved forest management – tree planting and rational water management – are among the most promising options to strategically plan climate change mitigation and adaptation for Greece.
Originality/value
– The presented study provides an insight into alternative mitigation and adaptation strategies against climate change. The use of the multi-criteria analysis is an innovative approach to outline the optimal bundle of strategies. The methodology focuses on specific parameters, leading to the most efficient package of measures for the area of Greece. Such an approach is implemented for the first time in Greece, at least up to the authors’ knowledge, and provides a basis for strategic governance and policy modeling for the area under consideration.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Development,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference34 articles.
1. Achillas, Ch.
,
Vlachokostas, Ch.
,
Moussiopoulos, N.
and
Banias, G.
(2011), “Prioritize strategies to confront environmental deterioration in urban areas: multicriteria analysis assessment of public opinion and expert’s views”,
Cities
, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 414-423. 2. Bank of Greece
(2011),
The Environmental, Economic and Social Impacts of Climate Change in Greece
, Bank of Greece, Athens. 3. Bellamy, R.
,
Chilvers, J.
,
Vaughan, N.-E.
and
Lenton, T.-M.
(2012), “Appraising Geoengineering”, Working Paper No. 153, Tyndall Centre for Climate Research. 4. Bellamy, R.
,
Chilvers, J.
,
Vaughan, N.E.
and
Lenton, T.M.
(2013), “Opening up’ geoengineering appraisal: multi-criteria mapping of options for tackling climate change”,
Global Environmental Change
, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 926-937. 5. Brugger, J.
and
Crimmins, M.
(2013), “The art of adaptation: living with climate change in the rural American Southwest”,
Global Environmental Change
, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 1830-1840.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|