Abstract
PurposeThe healthcare sector faces new financial and managerial accountability demands, along with their clinical accountability. Various studies show strong opposition by clinicians to new accountability tools, new structures and new ways of working. Less attention is paid to the innovative roles doctors can play in leading changes that use new managerial tools and techniques. The purpose of this paper is to analyse two original case studies illustrating how general practitioners (GPs) in Germany have led radical change.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws upon original research in Germany to present two case studies using a qualitative method, which are analysed using Glaser and Strauss' conventions of grounded theory, structured by Wenger's communities of practice framework, supporting a comprehensive literature review.FindingsGPs are found to be able to lead radical change in healthcare delivery models and organisation using entrepreneurial talents developed in their practice businesses and to embrace modernising tools and techniques and in the process redefine their identities to include management process in addition to medical competences.Originality/valueThe paper presents two original case studies of radical change leading to an integration of healthcare services in Germany. The approach adopted by the German GPs reveals important general lessons for practitioners, as does the analytical framework employed in the paper.
Subject
Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference46 articles.
1. Argyris, C. (1977), “Double loop learning in organisations”, Harvard Business Review, September/October.
2. Audit Commission (1996), What the Doctor Ordered: A Study of GP Fundholders in England and Wales, HMSO, London.
3. Bärnighausen, T. and Sauerborn, R. (2002), “One hundred and eighteen years of the German health insurance system: are there any lessons for middle‐ and low‐income countries?”, Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 54, pp. 1559‐87.
4. Baumard, P. (1999), Tacit Knowledge in Organizations, Sage, London.
5. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society, Sage, London.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献