Abstract
PurposeThe paper seeks to examine how an online maternity record involving pregnant women worked as a means to create shared maternity care.Design/methodology/approachEthnographic techniques have been used. The paper adopts a theoretical/methodological framework based on science and technology studies.FindingsThe paper shows how a version of “the responsible patient” emerges from the project which is different from the version envisioned by the project organisation. The emerging one is concerned with the boundary between primary and secondary sector care, and not with the boundary between home and clinic, which the project identifies as problematic and seeks to transgress.Research limitations/implicationsThe pilot project, which is used as a case, is terminated prematurely. However, this does not affect the fact that more attention should be paid to the specific redistribution of responsibilities entailed in shared care projects. Rather than seeking to connect all actors in an unbounded space, shared care might instead suggest a space for patients and professionals to experiment with new roles and responsibilities.Practical implicationsWhen designing coordination tools for health care, IT designers and project managers should attend to the specific ways in which boundaries are inevitably enacted and to the ways in which care is already shared. This will provide them with opportunities to use the potentials of new identities and concerns that emerge from changing the organisation of healthcare in relation to IT design.Originality/valueThe paper shows that “unshared” care does not exist; care is always shared among human and nonhuman actors. It also points to the value of studying how boundaries are enacted in projects that seek to create continuity across boundaries.
Subject
Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference22 articles.
1. Bansler, J., Havn, E., Johannsen, N. and Winthereik, B. (2006), “Elektronisk svangrejournal i Fyns Amt: evaluering af et pilotprojekt”, CICT Working Paper, Center for Information and Communication Technologies, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby.
2. Berg, M. (2001), “Implementing IT in health care organizations: myths and challenges”, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 64 No. 2, pp. 143‐56.
3. Bloomfield, B.P. (1995), “Power, machines and social relations: delegating to information technology in the National Health Service”, Organization, Vol. 2 Nos 3/4, pp. 489‐518.
4. Doolin, B. (2003), “Narratives of change: discourse, technology and organization”, Organization, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 751‐70.
5. Eikelberg, I., Spreeuwenberg, C., Wolffenbuttel, B., van Wilderen, L. and Mur‐Veeman, I. (2003), “Nurse‐led shared care projects: lessons from the nurses viewpoint”, Health Policy, Vol. 66, pp. 11‐27.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献