Conceptualisations of trust in the organisational literature

Author:

Connell N.A.D.,Mannion R.

Abstract

PurposeThis paper evaluates the non‐healthcare organisational literature on conceptualisations of trust. The aim of the paper is to review this diverse literature, and to reflect on the potential insights it might offer healthcare researchers, policy makers and managers.Design/methodology/approachA number of the key concepts that contribute to contrasting definitions of trust in the organisational literature are identified.FindingsThe paper highlights the heterogeneity of trust as an organisational concept. Aspects of trust that relate more specifically to non‐healthcare settings are shown to have some potential relevance for healthcare. Five aspects of trust, considered to have particular significance to the changing face of the NHS, appear to offer scope for further exploration in healthcare settings.Practical implicationsThe NHS continues to face changes to its organisational structures, both planned and unplanned. Healthcare providers will need to be alert to intra‐ and inter‐organisational relationships, of which trust issues will form an inevitable part. Whilst it might be argued that the lessons offered by conceptualisations of trust within wider organisational settings have limitations, the paper demonstrates sufficient areas of overlap to encourage cross‐fertilisation of ideas.Originality/valueThe paper draws together previous research on a topic of increasing relevance to healthcare researchers, which has exercised management researchers for at least three decades. The paper acts as a guide to future research and practice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference76 articles.

1. Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York, NY.

2. Baier, A. (1986), “Trust and anti‐trust”, Ethics, Vol. 96 No. 2, pp. 231‐60.

3. Barber, B. (1983), The Logic and Limits of Trust, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

4. Bate, S.P. and Robert, G. (2002), “Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: lessons for modernising the National Health Service in England and Wales”, Public Administration, Vol. 80, pp. 643‐63.

5. Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, John Wiley, New York, NY.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3