Using a technological community framework to manage new medical technologies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Using a technological community framework to manage new medical technologies

Published:2003-12-01 Issue:6 Volume:17 Page:399-421
ISSN:1477-7266
Container-title:Journal of Health Organization and Management
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Rusinko C.A.,Sesok‐Pizzini D.A.

Abstract

A technological community framework can be used to explain and manage new medical technologies. It describes emergence, commercialization, and standardization of an innovation or technology within the context of its whole network (or community) of stakeholders. This framework is used to illustrate the emergence, commercialization, and standardization of a relatively new medical technology – umbilical cord blood (UCB) banking. Umbilical cord blood may prove to be a source of stem cells for bone marrow transplant that is safer, more accessible, and less expensive than current sources of stem cells. The technological community framework can signal potential problems as the technology emerges, and help healthcare delivery systems and providers to effectively assess and manage the technology. The framework can also be applied to other medical technologies and innovations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference48 articles.

1. Abrams and Hessel (1987), “Health technology assessment: problems and challenges”, American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 149, pp. 1127‐32.

2. Aekerlof, G.A. (1970), “The market for lemons: quality, uncertainty and the market mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, pp. 488‐500.

3. Arcese, W., Iori, A.P., Screnci, M., Guglielmi, C., Mengarelli, A., Carmini, D., Testi, A.M., Moleti, M.L., Cimino, G., Perrone, P., Laurenti, L., Elia, L., Boecklin, F., Romano, A., De Felice, L. and Mandelli, F. (1998), “Umbilical cord blood transplant from HLA‐mismatched unrelated donor in high‐risk leukemia”, Bone Marrow Transplant, Vol. 21 No. Suppl. 3, pp. S85‐6.

4. Armitage, S., Warwick, R., Fehily, D., Navarrete, C. and Contreras, M. (1999), “Cord blood banking in London: the first 1000 collections”, Bone Marrow Transplant, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 139‐45.

5. Barker, J.N., Weisdorf, D.J. and Wagner, J.E. (2001), “Creation of a double chimera after the transplantation of umbilical‐cord blood from two partially matched unrelated donors”, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 344 No. 24, pp. 1870‐1.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Consumer Behavioral Intention of Adopting Emerging Healthcare Technology;IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management;2022

2. The technological community as a framework for educating for sustainability in business schools;Journal of Management & Organization;2011-11-22

3. The technological community as a framework for educating for sustainability in business schools;Journal of Management & Organization;2011-09

4. The technological community as a framework for educating for sustainability in business schools;Journal of Management & Organization;2011-09

5. Diagnostic Knowledge in the Genetic Economy and Commerce;The Moral, Social, and Commercial Imperatives of Genetic Testing and Screening;2006