Do follower characteristics moderate leadership and employee engagement?

Author:

Zhang Tanyu,C. Avery Gayle,Bergsteiner Harald,More Elizabeth

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to, given that most research focusses on leaders and ignores the influence of follower characteristics on either leadership or engagement, investigate whether employee characteristics moderate the relationship between perceived leadership styles and employee engagement. Recent research has shown that visionary and organic leadership paradigms positively influence employee engagement, compared with classical and transactional leadership environments (Zhang et al., 2014). Design/methodology/approach – Questionnaire data from 432 sales assistants, collected from retail shopping malls in Sydney, Australia, were analyzed. Findings – Structured regression analysis confirmed that the employee characteristics of need for achievement, equity sensitivity and need for clarity moderate the relationship between four leadership paradigms and employee engagement. The nature of the moderation varies in complex ways. Research limitations/implications – There is scope to confirm this study in different contexts, to include additional employee characteristics and reconfirm some scales and to remove common method variance. Practical implications – The findings suggest that to improve employee engagement: employers should recruit staff exhibiting characteristics predicted to generate high employee engagement; organizations should develop supervisors to ensure that they adopt leadership styles found to drive employee engagement; and recruiters should consider matching the characteristics of employees to the prevailing leadership paradigm(s) in the organization. Originality/value – This paper addresses a major gap in the literature by examining the moderating effects of follower characteristics on different leadership paradigms and employee engagement.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science

Reference97 articles.

1. Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, in Berkowitz, and L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 267-299.

2. Aon Hewitt (2011), Best Employers in Australia and New Zealand: Driving High Performance through Employee Engagement. Highlights Report, Aon Hewitt, Sydney.

3. Attridge, M. (2009), “Measuring and managing employee work engagement: a review of the research and business literature”, Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 383-398.

4. Avery, G.C. (2004), Understanding Leadership: Paradigms and Cases, Sage, London.

5. Babbie, E. (1998), The Practice of Social Research, Wadsworth, California.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3