An analysis of risk management tools utilized by Illinois farmers
Author:
Tudor Kerry,Spaulding Aslihan,D. Roy Kayla,Winter Randy
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationships among choice of risk management tools, perceived effectiveness of risk management tools, self-reported risk attitude, and farm and farmer characteristics.
Design/methodology/approach
– A mail survey was used to collect information about utilization of risk management tools, perceived effectiveness of risk management tools, and factors that could influence choice of risk management tools by Illinois farmers. Cluster analysis, one-way ANOVA, χ2 tests of independence, and multinomial logistic regression were utilized to detect possible relationships among choice of risk management tools, perceived effectiveness of risk management tools, self-reported risk attitude, and farm and farmer characteristics.
Findings
– Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that age and gross farm income (GFI) were the strongest predictors of the risk management tool utilization group to which an individual would be assigned. The number of risk management tools utilized decreased with age but increased with GFI. Neither self-reported risk attitude nor education was a significant independent variable in the multinomial logistic regression model, but both were strongly impacted by age. Younger farmers with higher GFI were the most likely users of hedging.
Research limitations/implications
– The results of this study provide support for the idea that farmers who are better able to generate revenue are better able to manage risk, but the direction of causality was not investigated.
Practical implications
– Risk management service providers could benefit from this study as a benchmark for understanding their current and potential farmer clients’ risk management strategies.
Originality/value
– This study used cluster analysis and multinomial logistic regression to address the complexity of decisions regarding multiple risk management tools. The number of tools utilized by individuals was investigated.
Subject
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference22 articles.
1. Baquet, A.
,
Hambleton, R.
and
Jose, D.
(1997), Introduction to Risk Management, Risk Management Agency, USDA, Washington, DC. 2. Barry, P.J.
,
Escalante, C.L.
and
Bard, S.K.
(2001), “Economic risk and the structural characteristics of farm businesses”, Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 61 No. 1, pp. 74-86. 3. Cole, S.
and
Kirwan, B.
(2009), “Between the corporation and the household: commodity prices, risk management, and agriculture production in the United States”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 91 No. 5, pp. 1243-1249. 4. Ginder, M.
,
Spaulding, A.D.
,
Winter, J.R
and
Tudor, K.
(2010), “Crop insurance purchase decisions: a study of Northern Illinois farmers”, Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, Vol. 73 No. 1, pp. 3-22. 5. Ginder, M.G.
,
Spaulding, A.D.
,
Tudor, K.W.
and
Winter, J.R.
(2009), “Factors affecting crop insurance purchase decisions by Northern Illinois farmers”, Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 113-125.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|