Towards designing telepresence robot navigation for people with disabilities
Author:
M. Tsui Katherine,McCann Eric,McHugh Amelia,Medvedev Mikhail,A. Yanco Holly,Kontak David,L. Drury Jill
Abstract
Purpose
– The authors believe that people with cognitive and motor impairments may benefit from using of telepresence robots to engage in social activities. To date, these systems have not been designed for use by people with disabilities as the robot operators. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors conducted two formative evaluations using a participatory action design process. First, the authors conducted a focus group (n=5) to investigate how members of the target audience would want to direct a telepresence robot in a remote environment using speech. The authors then conducted a follow-on experiment in which participants (n=12) used a telepresence robot or directed a human in a scavenger hunt task.
Findings
– The authors collected a corpus of 312 utterances (first hand as opposed to speculative) relating to spatial navigation. Overall, the analysis of the corpus supported several speculations put forth during the focus group. Further, it showed few statistically significant differences between speech used in the human and robot agent conditions; thus, the authors believe that, for the task of directing a telepresence robot's movements in a remote environment, people will speak to the robot in a manner similar to speaking to another person.
Practical implications
– Based upon the two formative evaluations, the authors present four guidelines for designing speech-based interfaces for telepresence robots.
Originality/value
– Robot systems designed for general use do not typically consider people with disabilities. The work is a first step towards having our target population take the active role of the telepresence robot operator.
Subject
General Computer Science
Reference71 articles.
1. Abascal, J.
and
Nicolle, C.
(2005), “Moving towards inclusive design guidelines for socially and ethically aware HCI”, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 484-505. 2. Aipperspach, R.
,
Cohen, E.
and
Canny, J.
(2006), “Modeling human behavior from simple sensors in the home”, Pervasive Computing, Vol. 3968, pp. 337-348, available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/11748625_21 3. Akkeer, H.O.D.
(2009), “On addressee prediction for remote hybrid meeting settings”, Master's thesis, University of Twente, Enschede. 4. Allen, M.
,
Leung, R.
,
McGrenere, J.
and
Purves, B.
(2008), “Involving domain experts in assistive technology research”, Universal Access in the Information Society, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 145-154. 5. Anderson, A.
,
Bader, M.
,
Bard, E.
,
Boyle, E.
,
Doherty, G.
,
Garrod, S.
,
Isard, S.
,
Kowtko, J.
,
McAllister, J.
,
Miller, J.
,
Sotillo, C.
,
Thompson, H.
and
Weinert, R.
(1991), “The HCRC map task corpus”, Language and Speech, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 351-366.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|