Author:
Matus Ilse Valenzuela,Alves Jorge Lino,Góis Joaquim,Vaz-Pires Paulo,Barata da Rocha Augusto
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to review cases of artificial reefs built through additive manufacturing (AM) technologies and analyse their ecological goals, fabrication process, materials, structural design features and implementation location to determine predominant parameters, environmental impacts, advantages, and limitations.
Design/methodology/approach
The review analysed 16 cases of artificial reefs from both temperate and tropical regions. These were categorised based on the AM process used, the mortar material used (crucial for biological applications), the structural design features and the location of implementation. These parameters are assessed to determine how effectively the designs meet the stipulated ecological goals, how AM technologies demonstrate their potential in comparison to conventional methods and the preference locations of these implementations.
Findings
The overview revealed that the dominant artificial reef implementation occurs in the Mediterranean and Atlantic Seas, both accounting for 24%. The remaining cases were in the Australian Sea (20%), the South Asia Sea (12%), the Persian Gulf and the Pacific Ocean, both with 8%, and the Indian Sea with 4% of all the cases studied. It was concluded that fused filament fabrication, binder jetting and material extrusion represent the main AM processes used to build artificial reefs. Cementitious materials, ceramics, polymers and geopolymer formulations were used, incorporating aggregates from mineral residues, biological wastes and pozzolan materials, to reduce environmental impacts, promote the circular economy and be more beneficial for marine ecosystems. The evaluation ranking assessed how well their design and materials align with their ecological goals, demonstrating that five cases were ranked with high effectiveness, ten projects with moderate effectiveness and one case with low effectiveness.
Originality/value
AM represents an innovative method for marine restoration and management. It offers a rapid prototyping technique for design validation and enables the creation of highly complex shapes for habitat diversification while incorporating a diverse range of materials to benefit environmental and marine species’ habitats.
Reference222 articles.
1. 3D Systems (2017), ProJet MJP [WWW Document]. 3D Syst. URL, available at: www.3dsystems.com/3d-printers/projet-mjp-5600 (accessed 15 April 23).
2. 3DEO (2018), “Low-cost production metal 3D printing: 3DEO’s intelligent layering®. 3DEO - Met”, Addit. Manuf. URL, available at: www.3deo.co/metal-3d-printing/low-cost-production-metal-3d-printing-intelligent-layering/ (accessed 1 January 22).
3. A review of ‘3D concrete printing’: materials and process characterization, economic considerations and environmental sustainability;Journal of Building Engineering,2023
4. 3D-printed biodegradable composite scaffolds with significantly enhanced mechanical properties via the combination of binder jetting and capillary rise infiltration process;Additive Manufacturing,2021
5. Design consideration for additive manufacturing: fused deposition modelling;Open Journal of Applied Sciences,2017