The power of reciprocal knowledge sharing relationships for startup success

Author:

Allen Thomas J,Gloor Peter,Fronzetti Colladon Andrea,Woerner Stephanie L,Raz Ornit

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the innovative capabilities of biotech start-ups in relation to geographic proximity and knowledge sharing interaction in the R & D network of a major high-tech cluster. Design/methodology/approach – This study compares longitudinal informal communication networks of researchers at biotech start-ups with company patent applications in subsequent years. For a year, senior R & D staff members from over 70 biotech firms located in the Boston biotech cluster were polled and communication information about interaction with peers, universities and big pharmaceutical companies was collected, as well as their geolocation tags. Findings – Location influences the amount of communication between firms, but not their innovation success. Rather, what matters is communication intensity and recollection by others. In particular, there is evidence that rotating leadership – changing between a more active and passive communication style – is a predictor of innovative performance. Practical implications – Expensive real-estate investments can be replaced by maintaining social ties. A more dynamic communication style and more diverse social ties are beneficial to innovation. Originality/value – Compared to earlier work that has shown a connection between location, network and firm performance, this paper offers a more differentiated view; including a novel measure of communication style, using a unique data set and providing new insights for firms who want to shape their communication patterns to improve innovation, independently of their location.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference55 articles.

1. Allen, T.J. (1984), Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization , MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

2. Allen, T.J. , Raz, O. and Gloor, P. (2009), “Does geographic clustering still benefit high tech new ventures?”, working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineering System Division, Cambridge, MA.

3. Barsky, N.P. (1999), “A core/periphery structure in a corporate budgeting process”, Connections , Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 1-29.

4. Battistoni, E. and Fronzetti Colladon, A. (2014), “Personality correlates of key roles in informal advice networks”, Learning and Individual Differences , Vol. 34, pp. 63-69.

5. Bloom, N. and Van Reenen, J. (2002), “Patents, real options and firm performance”, The Economic Journal , Vol. 112 No. 478, pp. C97-C116.

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3