Lecturers’ perspectives on how introductory economic courses address sustainability

Author:

Green Tom L.

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this article is to explore sustainability commitments’ potential implications for the curriculum of introductory economics courses. Universities have signed the Talloires Declaration, committing themselves to promoting students’ environmental literacy and ecological citizenship, thereby creating pressure to integrate sustainability across the curriculum. Design/methodology/approach – A case study approach involving qualitative research methods and the three largest public universities in British Columbia, Canada, was used. As one component of a larger study, 11 of the 19 economists who delivered the course over the study period were interviewed. The theoretical framework was informed by ecological economics scholarship on how mainstream economic thought represents environment-economy linkages. Findings – Findings suggest that universities’ sustainability commitments have not influenced principles of economics curriculum. Sustainability is not salient to lecturers; prospects that mainstream economics departments will integrate sustainability into curriculum in a timely manner without external pressure appear limited. Practical implications – While institutions often enthusiastically report on courses that contribute to students’ ecological literacy, identifying curriculum that may confound student understanding of sustainability receives less emphasis. Introductory economics courses appear to merit scrutiny from this perspective. Originality/value – About 40 per cent of North American university students take an introductory economics course, relatively few take more advanced economics courses. This course, thus, teaches many students economic theory and the economics profession’s approach to evaluating public policy, and has potential to contribute to knowledge of sustainability. Few studies examine how undergraduate economics curriculum addresses sustainability.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference58 articles.

1. Ayres, R.U. (2007), “On the practical limits to substitution”, Ecological Economics , Vol. 61 No. 1, pp. 115-128.

2. Becker, H.S. (2001), “The epistemology of qualitative research”, in Emerson, and R.M. (Ed.), Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations , 2nd ed., Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL, pp. 317-330.

3. Becker, W.E. (2000), “Teaching economics in the 21st century”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives , Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 109-119.

4. Becker, W.E. (2004), “Good-bye old, hello new in teaching economics”, Australasian Journal of Economics Education , Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 5-17.

5. Becker, W.E. (2007), “Quit lying and address the controversies: there are no dogmata, laws, rules or standards in the science of economics”, American Economist , Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 3-14.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3