Women’s working hours

Author:

Andringa Wouter,Nieuwenhuis Rense,Van Gerven Minna

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how the interplay between individual women’s gender role attitudes, having young children at home, as well as the country-context characterized by gender egalitarianism and public childcare support, relates to women’s working hours in 23 European countries. Design/methodology/approach – This study presents results of multilevel regression analyses of data from the European Social Survey (Round 2). These micro-level data on 23 European countries were combined with country-level measures on gender traditionalism and childcare expenditure. Findings – The authors found that the negative association between having young children at home and women’s working hours is stronger for women with traditional gender role attitudes compared to women with egalitarian attitudes. The gap in working hours between women with and without young children at home was smaller in countries in which the population holds egalitarian gender role attitudes and in countries with extensive public childcare support. Furthermore, it was found that the gap in employment hours between mothers with traditional or egalitarian attitudes was largest in countries with limited public childcare support. Social implications – Policy makers should take note that women’s employment decisions are not dependent on human capital and household-composition factors alone, but that gender role attitudes matter as well. The authors could not find evidence of the inequality in employment between women with different gender role attitudes being exacerbated in association with childcare support. Originality/value – The originality of this study lies in the combined (rather than separate) analysis of how countries’ social policies (childcare services) and countries’ attitudes (gender traditionalism) interact with individual gender role attitudes to shape cross-national variation in women’s working hours.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science

Reference41 articles.

1. Achen, C.H. (2002), “Toward a new political methodology: microfoundations and ART”, Annual Review of Political Science , Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 423-450.

2. Adema, W. , Fron, P. and Ladaique, M. (2011), “Is the European welfare state really more expensive?: indicators on social spending, 1980-2012; and a manual to the OECD Social Expenditure Database (SOCX)”, Working Paper No. 124, Social, Employment and Migration, OECD Publishing.

3. Albrecht, J.W. , Edin, P.A. and Vroman, S.B. (2000), “A cross-country comparison of attitudes towards mothers working and their actual labor market experience”, Labour , Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 591-607.

4. Bates, D. , Maechler, M. and Dai, B. (2010), “lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes”, R Package, available at: http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lme4 (accessed March 1, 2014).

5. Becker, G.S. (1981), A Treatise on the Family , Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3